Comment DOMINATING!... (Score 1) 301
Read it out-loud in your UT announcer voice and it's even more awesome...
Read it out-loud in your UT announcer voice and it's even more awesome...
.NET was a mostly foiled attempt of microsoft to do the same thing with C that they did to Netscape. Why hand that over to Microsoft by implementing some cross-platform version of a noose they can hang you with? They are bad enough when the law *isn't* on their side.
I don't understand what would drive anyone to do this unless they are on the Microsoft bank-roll.
Google is just trying to make a marketing argument to put some momentum behind their Chromebook. There is no solution which is completely 'torture' free... even an Abacus can be frustrating.
No matter how much you want it to be gone, Flash is like ActiveX and IE. A necessary piece of software for many production applications in use today. To take those pieces away means costing corporation several thousands if not millions in re-inventing their wheels. Corporations don't like to that, and many IT budgets aren't fat enough to do it. No matter how much Steve Jobs bitches about it his argument is irrelevant - at least at this point in time.
It will take the industry a good many years to shift away from their crappy software suite dependencies (IE, Flash, Active-X, etc, etc) but until that happens, we are stuck with Flash so let's just stop with all the whining.
It's not enough to pursue fossil fuels to the point of destroying the environment on a global scale, but what really, really pisses me off is that the 10 motherf@#$ in control of the world's supply are so crazed with insatiable greed that they can, and will, continue to as they wish with no regard for anything. They are unstoppable becuase they own the lawmakers.
I'm looking at you especially, Walker; you kochsucker.
Never ask two questions in a business letter. The reply will discuss the one you are least interested, and say nothing about the other.