Comment Re:Look harder (Score 1) 213
Interesting, I'll read up on that
Interesting, I'll read up on that
He just said the tv could handle it, but pretty much anything else could handle it too. I'd be surprised if at least Android, iOS, and Windows apps weren't made.
Who said it needs to be in the TV? That's just an example. Use a Roku, Android TV, Apple TV, Amazon Fire, or Windows box if you prefer.
The difference with ether is that the behaviour of light would change depending on your motion relative to the ether. The CMB is a frame of reference that is visible to everyone, but it is no different from any other frame of reference you choose.
I think a big part of the problem is that phones don't have standardized hardware interfaces the way PCs do. You can't just install Linux on a computer with completely proprietary hardware.
TL;DR: The theory is that Google couldn't update their Nexus 5 to Android 7 because the hardware doesn't meet an arbitrary requirement for Vulkan support that Google set.
Sure, as long as you report on every fatality involving the cars they claim they are safer than too.
How are the risks from a Tesla greater than the risks from hybrid cars which are all over the place?
No "fully qualified expert" said we would die if we went faster than 35 mph. The people who said that had no evidence or observation to support the idea and there was in fact evidence to the contrary (cheetahs, lions, many types of birds) that they were ignoring.
Don't conflate saying something is too hard (likely to be proven wrong eventually) with saying something is impossible based on known physics (less likely to be proven wrong).
Good education and the capacity to take care of everyone's basic needs should make cults and terrorists a non-issue. We are talking about an advanced civilization, I think we can assume those things would exist on a starship.
Laws of physics aren't usually found to be wrong, they are just improved when new cases that haven't been previously considered are discovered. For instance Einstein didn't show that Newton was wrong, he just found that Newton's laws didn't work well for extremely high speeds. You'll note that Newton's math still works just as well as Einstein's does for almost all terrestrial applications.
He "forgets" plenty of stuff when convenient.
The sheer transparency of Assange's bias against Clinton is also hilarious. He's admitted that he times releases so that they case the most harm, so transparency isn't his only goal. He's also made ridiculous insinuations against Clinton which have no merit.
It's entirely reasonable to assume that if he had anything against Trump he would sit on it or time the release so that it causes the least harm (i.e. after the election).
Easily, they know the number of potential customers in the areas covered by their limited rollout and set their expectations based on that.
Hundreds of mechanics though? Doubtful.
With your bare hands?!?
