Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Democrat? (Score 1) 182

Jane do not divide.

Who's "dividing"? I asked a legitimate question. Your assumption that I was trying to "divide" is actually dividing.

Would you have said the same thing if I had said it was a Republican rather than a Democrat? I am curious.

My point was simply that a Democrat was blatantly pandering to corporate money. That might not be "fascism" in a genuine technical sense, but it is pretty close to the popular sense and the modern version of what is often called fascism.

And "be polite", my ass. I have already emailed and otherwise notified both the FCC and my erstwhile representatives in Congress, and told them what I think of Wheeler's idea. I was blunt and to the point. Politeness is not appropriate when regulators are guilty of such blatant bullshit.

But just for the record: no, I did not accuse him of being a "fascist" in those communications, because it's not technically accurate. Read my original comment again. I wrote that he was "acting like" one.

Comment Re:"open source nature of Autodesk's platform" ??? (Score 1) 85

you are funny, AutoDesk has 85% market share, they are the de factor standard. The are certainty The Relevant ones. The cost of their software is nothing to the companies that use them to make millions to billions a year in profits.

The open source CAD alternatives are crap, sad to say. There is no credible threat to AutoDesk on the horizon for at least the next decade

Yes, the industry uses Autocad. Just like Artists used to use Apple almost to exclusion. But now the indi-people are moving to other things because Autocad is insanely expensive. (and yes, the price really is insane) So what happened when all the indi-people started doing graphic art and recording on IBM PCs in the late 90s early 2000s? It didn't go so well for the apple desktop. Teenagers couldn't learn on ultra-expensive apple computers and apple software so they learned on PCs. When they got to school they took that knowledge with them and the idustry realized they could get away with buying stuff that was 1/10th the price. The market now is rife with PC art and recording software that's every bit as good as anything apple has.

I think the same thing is going on with Autocad now. Highschool kids in their basement with a 3D printer aren't playing around with Autocad... and that should be very worrying to Autodesk. And the next decade? You're probobly right there... I'm talking 5 to 10 years out. But do you think Autodesk isn't planning that far? They'd be foolish if they weren't.

Comment Re:Do not want (Score 2) 81

You honestly read the grandparent and don't believe they weren't stereotyping? The fact that the grandparent was moderated to "funny" is a separate, disturbing fact in and of itself.

Yes, I honestly read GP and I don't see any "stereotyping".

I have honestly read your comment, and I do see stereotyping.

Since when is "you know who I mean" a racist comment? In my opinion, assuming it was racist is both racist and paranoid.

But that's just my opinion.

Comment lame (Score 0, Troll) 182

Lets regulate netflix instead.

99% of slashdot doesn't even want to admit there's a problem.

Netlfix (and yes, this is entirely about netflix and almost no-one else) has no finacial reason to be responsible with how they transmit data. Every ISP out there hates them. Not because they compete. Netflix is one of the few reasons people haven't gone entirely to their cellphones for the internet. What they hate is that Netflix is completely irresponsible when it comes to how they handle transmitting their data. No Cache. No real peering. They switch networks seemingly at random with no notification. All at tremendous detriment to the ISPs network.

The ISPs don't want to end net neutrality. Quite the opposite. Traffic shaping and bandwidth caps are expensive. You need equipment and people to deal with that. But they have to make Netflix poor network decisions hurt netflix. It's the only way they can see to reign them in. The FCC's answer is what you see here. I think it's a terrible idea.

What I'd suggest is something a bit more reasonable. Why is it that Netflix is unregulated? They're basically a broadcaster right? Why not get the ISPs together with Netflix and come up with some industry standards? If you're going to supply 34% of the content during peak usage, why shouldn't you be under some obligation to do it in a way that wasn't going to harm the network? Wouldn't that be more reasonable than the insanity they're suggesting now?

Or are we going to continue to pretend there's this vast ISP conspiracy to stop you from using the internet because losing customers is somehow possible?

Comment Re:"Stung" ??? (Score 3, Insightful) 20

Skipjack was a good cipher. Key escrow was the problem.

Skipjack was not known to be compromised. That is true. But key escrow was a REAL problem. The whole thing was just plain a bad idea that would have enabled government spying and intrusion, and NIST knew that. (It's not enough to say there were "inadequate controls" on the keys. When government is involved there are never enough controls.)

None of this has much to do with my original point. Government was trying to get a foothold on your communications, and NIST was determined to allow it.

Comment Re:The fast lanes: a parable (Score 1) 182

A better analogy would be:
5% of people are driving RVs that take up both lanes and they drive like old ladies.
The road builder doesn't want to tick anyone off so they went to the RV manufacturer and asked "Could you keep the size of your RVs to a single lane so people can pass them and not get stuck behind them?" to which the RV manufacture said "Yea, no"

So then other road builders built parallel roads, that only had one lane and were cheaper. All the people that didn't have RVs (average facebook user) moved over to those roads if they could to get away from the RVs

The road builder was then stuck with all the RV people, and 5% of the revenue and still having to maintain 2 lane roads. They panicked and begged the government to let them put in a bypass so the non-RV people had a way to get around the RVs and the road builder wouldn't lose ALL of their customers over night.

Now the road builders roads are congested by hippies with picket signs yelling "Fascist" and "We are the 99%!!!" Rather than do something about the totally uncooperative RV manufacture flouting industry standards, they expect all the road builders to expand all the roads to 8 lane highways for free, and not raise the price. They cite the Autoban as an example of how "all of Europe" is better than what we have. Meanwhile the road builder is accepting offers on the road and quietly trying to buy a chain of pizza places because this is just to infuriating to deal with anymore.

Comment um (Score 1) 111

Support is Redhats only real product... (ok, they probably do development work to if you pay them to)

I'm sure they would support competitors products if you put it in your support contract. This is more like them clarifying "Our cheapest support contracts doesn't cover 3rd party stuff" but I guarantee if you're a top tier customer they're going to bend over backwards to help you. It's not like their Oracle and you're stuck with them. Their competitors OS's are compatible and just as free as theirs.

Comment Re:This is dismaying (Score 5, Informative) 182

Can we safely assume he has been bought and the others have been made promises regarding other issues they care about? The only thing I can hope for at this point is that these older, technology illiterate politicians will die off as younger people come in and change things for the better because they understand what's going on. I seriously doubt this though.

Um... I think you need to check your facts. You seem to think he's doing this out of ignorance.

Wheeler is hardly "technology illiterate". He was a lobbyist for cable companies! What he was trying to do was 100% intentional and deliberate.

The old saying goes, "Never attribute to malice what can be adequately explained by stupidity." But if you knew the whole story, you would know that stupidity does not adequately explain Wheeler's actions. It is malice, through and through.

Comment Re:Do not want (Score 3) 81

No we don't. We're going to need more info to see if you're referencing associates of yours, or are maybe some kind of racist, since the ignorant conservatives use "thug" as code for black people, and we don't know if you're one of those awful people.

I have never in my life heard the word "thugs" used as a "code for black people". That's the honest truth.

I have, however, heard people who call themselves "progressives" use the term as a code for conservatives. That's also just the honest truth.

Disclaimer: I am not a "conservative," so don't waste everybody's time by going there.

Comment Re:Help us Google Fiber! You're our only hope (Score 1) 90

Google is only installing fiber in major metropolitan areas. They have a few thousand people served. At best you'll see major markets like New York, Chicago, Austin, etc...

Most places in this country will literally never get fiber. ISPs are slowing deployment of it due to expense. I suspect the ISPs are concerned a wireless tech breakthrough could torpedo their business... and they very well may be right.

Comment "Stung" ??? (Score 2) 20

Stung by concerns that the NSA may have introduced deliberately weakened crypto algorithms, NIST is embarking on a review of its existing standards and developments.

Give me a break. NIST was solidly behind Skipjack and the Clipper Chip in the early 90s, an deliberately went ahead with approval even though during the public comment period, they received approximately 80,000 negative comments, and exactly 3 positive comments.

The very idea that they were "stung by the revelation" that NSA might have been behind subverting crypto is blatant BS. They have been the primary avenue for pushing this crap off onto the public.

Comment Re:Caps Are Definitely Coming (Score 1) 475

Customers always go with the cheapest provider, so they can't afford infrastructure improvements without cutting themselves out of the market.

Actually, as long as you force them to disclose the transfer caps, it becomes a potential selling point. When I was forced to transfer to an ISP with a cap, it didn't take me more than a month to see my usage. I certainly know that transfer was an important point when I was shopping for my VPS.

Yes, but the ISP doesn't want you. They want you to go away. They want your parents. You moving to a provider with a higher cap is a good thing. (at least for now)

As for 'infrastructure', I'd have to point out that much of the rest of the developed world manages to offer 10-1000 mbit to 'everyone'.

Not even remotely true. Only 1 country on earth has above 50% broadband coverage: Liechtenstein
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L...
It's all about population density. The more tightly your population is packed in, the cheaper it is to serve them.

My 'free market' solution is to start removing artificial barriers towards companies running their own infrastructure. I'd downright subsidize 'neighborhood cooperatives'. It's a known fact that if you even threaten these guys with competition that suddenly it's profitable to offer 100X the service at the same price.

Actually, I think you're kind of right there. With the FCC starting to regulate things I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of them just give up the infrastructure. It's expensive and difficult. Local municipalities could start doing it but they're going to have to buy back the franchise agreements they sold to the ISPs (what you call a monopoly)

Slashdot Top Deals

The difference between reality and unreality is that reality has so little to recommend it. -- Allan Sherman

Working...