So it's slightly less terrible now, whoopee.

Just watched a coworker try to find an outlook window, not only was it not appearing but couldn't right click the entry in the taskbar menu and move it into visibility. Every few days word documents stop loading correctly, not even all the widgets in the window will draw, have to quit (closing all open windows) and restart word to get it to work again.

Microsoft is still shit, and will always be shit.

That's not how anything works. They might as well sue everyone on the planet for the temporary copy their browser made. How ignorant.

They aren't making verbatim copies.

The only way to get what even looks like one is to use so many of the words from the original as input tokens that you have practically rewritten the output anyway.

Your linked article says to go to a bunch of places way more biased than Wikipedia if you want less bias. What a load of shit.

No one expects them to work for free.

Doctors get paid in the UK, for example.

"Microsoft software now is light years ahead of where it used to be."

Are we talking about the same software?

Stable and works? OneNote crashed when I renamed a note. Teams still isn't able to detect which messages you have read and update the flag on the icon correctly. Microsoft software is just as shit as it has ever been.

Hint, if you have to post that anonymously then you know it's wrong, coward.

"What exactly is he influencing? Certainly not product design. Everything Microsoft produces today is shit"

That sounds like Gates is involved to me...

This you bro? Tell your handlers to give you some better lines.

Trump is not smart enough to be a Russian agent and actual Russian agents are not dumb enough to trust him with any damning information. Trump is a Russian asset (and Melania is his handler.)

Telling them is fine, that's not what you're talking about and your use of that word is incorrect at best. I suspect it is more likely disingenuous.

I don't think it will do, because factory memory isn't necessarily any better than a replacement. It's not necessarily any worse, either, but there are very commonly cheaper and faster parts available towards the end of a memory product group's lifecycle.

I bought a Google TV because Roku gave up their only advantage, not showing ads on the home screen. Therefore there was no reason to get Roku when Google TVs have orders of magnitude more available apps. I don't understand why anyone would buy a Roku any more given that.

Trains historically used a diesel-electric powertrain only because you can't make a transmission strong enough to do the job, and if you could, it would probably be even more lossy.

Modern trains can be hybrids, they use inverter drive systems.

Nuclear power was sold with the lie "too cheap to meter" in the first place, that's literally where that saying comes from.

It was a lie then, and it's a lie now.