Do you develop on GitHub? You can keep using GitHub but automatically sync your GitHub releases to SourceForge quickly and easily with this tool so your projects have a backup location, and get your project in front of SourceForge's nearly 20 million monthly users. It takes less than a minute. Get new users downloading your project releases today!
You say that like it's funny, but their Bay Area office had an explicit "no Linux installs allowed" policy. Maybe they've changed that now (I got sick of it and left), but developing iOS was a nightmare.
And you wonder why the commands are so brutal...it's nearly impossible to write them.
It's more likely the code is British. It has "AOAKN" twice - once at the start and once at the end, and from the digraph frequency (below), "AO" "FN" and "AK" stand out. I think that rules out any Enigma-based codes (e.g. the British TypeX), as well as the US SIGABA - the AOAKN would not be repeated at the beginning and end. I haven't found a description of BAMS yet.
Digraph frequency:
2 AR
2 DJ
2 GH
2 JR
2 ME
2 RZ
2 UA
2 OA, 2 AK, 2 KN (this is AOAKN twice)
If it is either of these ciphers, that means it was a message encoded using a German encryption scheme.
I think that means the message was from a German spy in England or for a British spy in Axis territory. (And the pigeon's number on the band was an "unregistered" number.) Either way, it should be a very interesting message.
That's funny... I recall the judge cleared that all up. What kind of stretched strawman are you trying for here?
The kernel devs already have a legally tested copyright to the Linux kernel source. This is NVidia trying to license their API and failing. Why defend them? Oh and it's rich for you to call Alan Cox a hypocrite while you incorrectly tell him what his chosen license means.
The low-grade radioactive byproducts have short half-lives. They still need to be held on-site for the time it takes to reach a safe level of radioactivity.
The same stuff that is radioactive for millenia is the same stuff that is useful to new generation reactors, so ship that off-site.
But we're talking about the US here, so that usually ends up being stamped "un-economical" and the investors might actually sign off on the alternative: selling the spent fuel (thus being freed from a huge risk), so the spent fuel is bought by a separate company that actually thinks it can profit from buying it.
In other words, the economy is routing around the damage caused by US regulations.