Frankly, India is in the state that they are in because of their own highly nationalistic leadership.

You are posting this in a thread about a 9-0 court decision. Think about that.

It's sad that there was a time when all slashdot would have seen this the way you do, but looking through the comments that time has unfortunately passed.

This is very well put and gets to the heart of how these companies are trying to pick and choose which established norms apply to them, trying to claim neutrality in a process they very much have a hand in.

was in Swift's tweets: They intended to block a certain address as personal information, i.e. "Hey everyone let's go kick this guys ass at 12345 example drive in Memphis!" but accidentally blocked the individual components. So you might also gotten blocked for "12345 example drive", or possibly for "12345", "example", and "drive", in addition to "Memphis". "Memphis" was just the part that people ran into first.

The reduction in speed was intended to be applied to all customers, not just 20%.

Every time I hear about one of these cascade account bans, it seems to originate from a YouTube account. The last big one of these I heard about was when a ton of Markiplier fans were banned for "spamming" in a livestream chat, likewise getting their entire google accounts banned. Nevermind that they were asked to do this by the streamer, and it was hurting nobody; account bans for spamming a livestream chat is insane. This is why I don't and won't post, comment, or do anything on YouTube. I watch quite a bit of twitch, and YouTube has been trying to move into that space, but it will be a cold day in hell before I do anything interactive there. I might migrate to afreecaTV or whatever the hell the chinese are offering, at the most they might try to scam me out of my money. Google seems interested in trying to steal your whole life.

Good luck, from my understanding it was a walled-off echo chamber.

Can you link one? I'm curious what they look like.

I like the picture of no surface adhesion, with the print head just dragging the foundation around the site.

Some walls are more than 8 feet thick, which the architects claim will allow the house to stand in all but the most intense earthquakes.

Well that is a blast from the past.

But if you're adhering an inner drywall, and an exterior facade material, then this only is replacing the framing and not even all of that since you still have to install trusses (and possibly interior walls). Also where is your insulation, and where are you running your MEP? I have so many questions. .

This is an excellent point. I suppose the printer could lay in rebar, but it seems like it would be tough to get the print head around it. Assuming that it's a fiber reinforced concrete there is probably some appreciable shear strength, but I wouldn't imagine much. If the interior walls are also concrete and tie in, then that could give lateral support, but then you are stuck with structural concrete interior walls.

So concrete as a material for light residential has been tried before in the US, but was plagued with issues besides costs. I have numerous questions about this procedure. Also some real questions about that listing: as far as I can see it's some renders of the house-to-be, a front elevation, a picture of a completely different prototype house, and some interiors from that house filled with what looks like rendered furniture. This does not give me confidence.

Is this a joke?