Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Firefox 3.6 has lower RAM usage? (Score 5, Insightful) 807

3.6.x has been known for generally being more stable and using less RAM than the modern Firefox 10...

I actually don't agree with your premise. While Firefox had some issues around version 4, Firefox 10 is actually faster and more stable than Firefox 3.6 was, and RAM usage is on a downward trend. I understand that Firefox ~4 turned you off because I was really irritated by the regressions that came around that time, but things *did* get better. If you give it another try and make sure you give it a fair shake without already having decided it's worse, I think you'll find it's actually an improvement over what you're using right now. It's not like Firefox 3.6 was a speed demon in its day either... Firefox's memory hog problems go back way further than that.

Comment Re:Tenure (Score 1) 356

Traditionally, and still often the case, a lot of universities' cash comes from patrons. Prior to 1900 a lot of patrons expected control over the universities' curriculum as a result, so it wasn't uncommon for patrons to demand that a professor be fired if they were performing research the patrons considered counter to their interests; tenure was introduced as a policy to ensure that no patrons would expect to have that kind of control.

Comment Re:I am the author of the spreadsheet in question (Score 2) 386

I don't think you thought that part through well enough. Preventing discrimination and harassment against students because of their sexual orientation is a reasonable objective, especially given how much "gay" has become schoolyard slang. But you really haven't given enough thought to the consequences of forwarding e-mails containing those words to staff. Imagine that a student is trying to talk to another student, in private, about their own sexual orientation. By forwarding the e-mail that way, you've forcibly outed this student who thought they were having a private conversation. They probably wouldn't want staff to know about that, and it could conceivably even result in certain conservative staff members discriminating against students.

Comment Still just "piling on"? (Score 1) 272

So on earlier stories about this, there were a number of posters claiming that there was no evidence that this went further up than the News of the World staff, and that any attacks on Murdoch and News Corp were politically-motivated "piling on", in the words of Fox and Friends. I hope that they can admit they were wrong now.

Slashdot Top Deals

"The one charm of marriage is that it makes a life of deception a neccessity." - Oscar Wilde

Working...