Tell some telemarketer to put you on their "do not call" list, and then they call the next day. What are you going to do about it?

It's like telling migrants that it's illegal to cross the border.

The whole idea of containerized freight is: the entire trailer can be easily moved from truck, to train, to ship - you never have to even open the trailer.

If you are going to put the battery in the trailer, that would kill the whole idea. You might either have to unload the trailer, or ship the heavy expensive battery for hundreds or thousands of miles.

Anybody else notice that every few weeks there is some new miracle battery that is going to change everything?

And that is what really matters.

2 minute video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rO0Di1ET8Zg

I think there is a significant difference between bird avoiding a certain area, and birds being killed.

Extremely unlikely. Nuclear energy is generations past 1970s Soviet technology that powered Chernobyl. New nuclear technology is vastly safer.

But that is not a valid comparison. Comparing two different ways of creating electricity is different from comparing a method of creating electricity to a building.

Watch "Police State" by Dinesh D'Souza to learn about how Christians are being brazenly attacked by our government.

BTW: I am not a Christian myself, I am agnostic. But the persecution of Christians in our nation is obvious to anybody other than completely brainwashed leftists.

There are some people in the USA who want the USA to be some kind of Christian theocracy, but they are a small, persecuted, and powerless, minority.

I see nothing "right wing" about this. Seems to me that Marxist NYT is trying to smear conservatism again.

This has been my experience as well. I am presently using RHEL 8.5, and I find FreeBSD faster, and easier administration. My hardware is, at least, 5 years old, and I have no problem with drivers. I have never been a great fan of systemd. My favorite linux distro is Devuan. I use RHEL because I think I should be more proficient on something that is more widely used.

No. It's because a now-convicted criminal was one of the largest donors in the election cycle, and the money that very likely swung the outcomes of elections was illegally gained via fraud and ponzi schemes. Seems like something worth getting to the bottom of. I can't imagine anyone not simply trying to protect their own "team" wouldn't want this fully resolved. And I'm not a republican.

The skeptics love to point out how this or that area had record low temperatures "proving" that global warming is a hoax. That is cherry picked data, and therefore a load of crap. It's the same thing when global warming believers cherry pick data.