Now we know you're lying.
No one drinks Dr Pepper Ten.
That *hit is nasty.

I understand the chemistry. your chemsitry analysis is correct on teh face of it. But, similar to the other guy, something is at work when I drink soda.
Its purely anecdotal, and i dont know the mechanism at play, but i dont drink sodas because i get heartburn directly afterword, even if the soda was all I had.
simiarly i no longer enjoy tomato sauces for same reason, stomach no likey tomata sauces, or other acidic foods.

(well thats not strictly true..-I- still enjoy my italian...i just come prepared with a bucket of Tums before commencing the gorging)

why even make it a plate? who needs to innovate?

we've had electronic tolls tickers on our windshields (RFIDs) for years.
just use those.

no more unreadable plates. no more faded or peeling stickers.
just point the scanner at a car to get its license and registration.

no more visits to Hell, I mean, the DMV.
Just renew online or over the phone.

I can't wait to hack one, that way I can change my plate on the fly. Metal plates are a hassle to fake, but an electronic plate that is designed to change at the push of a button is going to make counterfeiting super easy.

Hell, you could have your plate change to a new (fake) number every time the odometer clicks over another mile. That will pollute all those fancy ANPR databases. You could really screw with those ANPR systems by using your own ANPR via a dash-cam that scans on-coming cars and once they have passed, switches your plate to that other car's license number.

Either way you'll have a very small chance of getting caught since it will change so fast and you don't even need to stop the car to do it. Besides, normally no one even looks at your plate unless something bad has already happened,

So the NSA did not screw with Dual_EC_DRBG in the NIST standard? Or is it just that any hardware which implements Dual_EC_DRBG is going to be rejected without explanation when it is submitted for FIPS 140 certification?

As John Oliver said on the Daily Show when these stories started to break:

"Mr. President, no one is saying you broke any laws, we're just saying it's a little bit weird you didn't have to."

I count 22 stories today (friday). At most 4 are NSA, and that's stretching it (epic browser isn't more about commercial trackers than government and Iran/Syria interception is only speculatively nsa). So ~15% NSA stories really isn't that overwhelming.

IF there is, than what is it? You were so bold and confident until I started digging in to your citation. What you have shown me is that your beliefs are based on a ridiculously lop-sided reading of the evidence not "at least as much" not even close, it is practically religious in how much it appears to simply be based on faith.

Right, he says zimmerman is following him and then shortly thereafter asks zimmerman why he's following him. Obviously Zimmerman was just standing around his truck minding his own business at that point and had not come up close enough to Martin for Jenteal to hear Martin's speech over the phone. He was probably just using a megaphone is all.

You stretch the limits of credulity to do exactly what you accused me of in your first post. With you it's always the benefit of the doubt for Zimmerman but not for Martin.

WSJ is simply reporting what the gov't reported, it isn't like WSJ intercepted this with its crack reporters. It is the US gov't that I don't trust.

You might wat to brush up on the reading skills. Skinny people have the more efficient bacteria.