Wasting a mod point to reply... Yes.
I have no issue giving the corporation the right to vote as an individual... One vote...
With the same limitations as to contributions an individual has. (one person) and prohibition of lobbying expenses over some trivial amount.
Corporations have "owned" politicians for ages. Thats what must end.
Here's what a "person" can contribute... Lobbying expenses perhaps should fall under these caps.
http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/thepoliticalsystem/a/contriblaws.htm
I'll take a shot at it... at least based on how the US legal and tax system work. (sort of inherited from the British, at least loosely)
There would likely be protections from criminal prosecution (inadmissible evidence or such) at least until they found enough evidence OTHER than the list itself.
BUT---The tax man doesn't really care much to prosecute you.
He wants his money.
You aren't likely to make much if convicted/in prison, so it's sort of a twisted win-win...
If you spent/lost it all and cannot pay him, then you may have a problem.
Right, but Netflix sends DVDs, not Syquest discs.
Besides, don't we have to scrap a bunch of them for the new START treaty?
They have a "use by date". Cmon...
That's an expensive way to kill goats and scare the crap out of the guys that left the place two days ago and pisses off the neutrals downwind enough for them to take up arms.
The idea fails on every single level even if you have zero morals.
The FAEs don't have fallout... and can have almost the same effect as a tactical nuke, particluarly so if you are hiding in a cave in the blast zone.
Some people cannot appreciate a decent ludicrous example when they see one.
The entire point of American warfare is to expend as much ammunition as possible so to stick the American public with the biggest bill possible. A 13 meter margin of error means you can justify using three guided missiles instead of one. How does a military contractor not see the benefit of that? How are they supposed to create business for you if you're tying them up in court!
These clowns can't possibly think they're actually looking for WMD's and Osama Bin Laden could they? They're looking for an intractable enemy to spend billions trying to irradicate, and they've found them in the Taliban, just like Isreal found the Palestinians. Spooky sneaky "bad guys" are literally booming business.
The enemy is only intractable due to the fact that we still have some morals and desperately try to keel collateral damage to a minimum.
This is also what drives the expensive drive for new toys.
If we could just nuke or FAE then bulldoze the whole place it would be cheaper.
The Taleban do not have any regard for human life, so they don't have that issue...quite the opposite.
Drug dealers are like that.
1) US creates military drones used in Pakistan.
2) Drones are controlled using software.
3) Software company that writes drone software is bought by IBM.
4) Software can now, potentially, be outsourced to IBM development personnel in um, Pakistan.
Is it just me, or is something wrong with this picture?
Don't ask me, before I followed the links, I was trying to figure out how IBM bought the CIA
They showed us the dangers of exposing the ruling class to lead for generations.
They also highlighted the effect of close inbreeding in the ruling class for generations...
(the southern republicans should take note )
If you buy a 200euro amd you get the best bang for your buck. If you buy a 800 euro Intel you get more bang but pay more bucks per bang.
That's all very well, but how many bangs could a bangbuck buck if a bangbuck could bang bucks?
Pathetic losers, everyone know the answer is 42
When was the last time you used the DVD drive? We're close to not needing them as it stands today.
Every time I ri---err... watch a DVD of course
Sorry, 600 dpi doesn't cut it for printing photos.
Maybe 20 years ago.
2400dpi (+ dithering) DOES, even if you just use it to proof what you are taking to Walmarts photolab for printing.
Don't get me wrong--- Color lasers are wonderful for what they are for.
They are NOT ideal for photo printing---Not their strong point at all.
Because color laser 'photo quality" prints look like modern inkjet prints set to "fast draft"?
My experience is more the opposite. A decent color laser printer produces photo quality prints at about eight pages per minute. A typical inkjet printer produces comparable quality prints about 100 times that slow. Anything an inkjet produces in a reasonable amount of time makes dot matrix printers look like an improvement. Ugliest prints on the planet, ink spatter and all.
Who said anything about speed?
Speed is not really the issue either unless you're printing many copies, which is silly to do at home on ~anything esp inkjets.
If I need 100 full size color photos I'm hitting Walmart/CVS/Kinkos(or whatever it's called now).
I have yet to see any ink splatter on anything in the last 10 years, even at work that's unusual.
I tried Epson last, no replaceable printhead and going on vacation killed it, I liked Canon, but no factory Linux support, or on recent machines.
HP printers rock w/linux support, and seems reliable so far, at least if you buy something decent.
The next setup I buy will be a business class all in one though, the consumer grade machines
Organic chemistry is the chemistry of carbon compounds. Biochemistry is the study of carbon compounds that crawl. -- Mike Adams