You forgot to multiply that 75% by the efficiency of the generator...

So, first: explanation of why coal produces more CO2 when burned than oil or gas. The short version is, "because coal has more carbon in it."

Next, comparison of efficiency of different types of fossil power. The charts you want are on pages 13 and 15. The data is pretty noisy because it's by country generating, but coal and oil are roughly the same efficiency if you remove the outlier datapoints.

The rest of my post is inferences drawn from those two metrics. You're welcome to dispute those inferences instead of dismissing my comment as nonsense. Ass.

RTM (1507) is good until 2025, 1607 is good until 2026, 1809 until 2029, but sadly 21H1 is good only until 2027. 21H1 IoT is good through 2032.

Windows 10 release information

This, so much this.

Windows 2000 plus the under-the-covers security improvements since then = much better than anything MS has actually shipped.

To be fair, several versions of Windows added significant under-the-hood security. XP Service Pack 2, Vista's "UAC" prompt (bad/annoying as ...., but better than not having it), 7, 10 (multiple versions), and 11 each brought something to the table security-wise.

Unfortunately most of them brought more and more stuff I don't need and don't want.

With so many RGB lights, your computer was just asking for it.

Are you sure about that?

Oil and coal have roughly the same efficiency for power generation, but coal produces more CO2 per ton than oil. That suggests you could put a generator on the ship to charge the batteries (burning bunker fuel) and have "lower lifetime emissions" than charging the ship from a coal power plant. Of course, instead of generating electric power with that bunker fuel, you could use it to turn the propeller shafts directly at even higher efficiency, so...

I haven't done the math, but unless the assumptions above are incorrect I would say you'd lose that bet.

It's true that the House of Representatives will not ratify this treaty. It's also true that the House will not ratify any treaties, because it is not part of the ratification process.

Again, you show a shocking lack of understanding about the treaty process. 50 + vice presidential tiebreak doesn't get you there, treaties in the US are ratified by a supermajority vote in the senate--you need 67 in favor (though, I suppose, under the right circumstances you could do it with as few as 35 votes in favor, i.e. if you convinced 49 senators to not show up that day you'd still have a quorum and the constitution specifies "two thirds of those present").

How soon before some kid^H^H^H^Hteen orders a bunch of stuff then his parents send it all back demanding a refund?

In most US states, most contracts with minors can be rescinded by their parents.

The summary suggests they never claimed it was certified N95. They claimed they used "N95 grade filters" (which was, apparently, true in that the filter material would block 95% of particles). They never claimed the mask itself was "certified" in any way.

I'm sure the droid that wrote the copy was probably using "N95 grade filters" in the exact same way that advertisers use the phrase "military grade encryption" to refer to 56-bit DES--technically true, but meaningless and misleading.

Well I know when I watch train webcams there are a shocking number of Prime containers on railcars. I think they have just scaled up massively.

Counterpoint: "you are required to document your criminal conspiracy and maintain those documents for seven years" has obvious 5th amendment problems.

What is your credit card number minus the current year?
What is the square of your credit card PIN?
What is 10 times the security code on the back of your credit card?
Type your name adding 1 letter to each letter, so A becomes B and so on, with Z becoming A.
Type your zip code backwards.

Problem is, while you are correct that it cycles from bad to good, every bad is way worse than the bad versions before it, thus every good is worse than the good versions before it, they are 'good' simply because they aren't as bad as the most recent bad.

So Windows Vista is better than Windows 8. Thus Windows 10 isn't as good as Windows 7, it's just better than Windows 8.

and at this point, I really feel Vista is better than 11.

Ners McSee ???

While "screeching" is certainly hyperbole, how about Hillary Rodham Clinton?

Maybe you think that's not a direct enough claim? How about this one:

Or maybe Jimmy Carter is more your speed?

Maybe the 11 Democrats who objected to the electoral vote certification on January 6, 2017?

No, sir. No allegations of stolen elections from Democrats, none at all.