Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Computers are tools. (Score 3, Insightful) 49

It seems logical then, if a computer accounting system is used in a place of work, such as a post office, the people operating the computer and submitting the accounting reports should be responsible, particularly for large scale and repeated errors, which seems to be the case here. No one will be charged for one wrong number on a balance sheet (unless it was clearly deliberate). The fact that these people were charged criminally suggests large scale and multiple discrepancies. It seems that regardless of "buggy software" they should bear some responsibility.

It's not quite clear what you're trying to say here. Who do you mean by "the people operating the computer"? If you mean the senior management in the post office then fine, yes, they should be held accountable. The people actually entering the information though had no choice or control at all. What happened was they entered all their transactions during the course of the day and then the system said they should have £N in the till, and in fact they had only £N - X in the till. The P.O. accused them of stealing the £X, and they had absolutely no way of demonstrating that they hadn't.

What boggles the mind is that the software must have been developed by people who had absolutely no experience of accounting systems. It shouldn't be possible for massive discrepancies like this to creep in. Everything must add up. If money was apparently disappearing from the shops, then it should have been mysteriously accumulating somewhere else. Basic double-entry book keeping procedures would have prevented all of this.

Comment Re:Broke a new CPU (Score 2) 301

The very first time I built my own computer from bits the man in the shop said he'd do the actual installation of the CPU in the motherboard to make sure the settings were right. (This was in the days before CPUs needed heatsinks.)

I did all the rest and the computer worked fine for about 6 months, then became unreliable. Having replaced most things I came to the conclusion that the fault lay in the CPU and so ordered a new one. When I went to install it I discovered the problem - he'd set the voltage jumpers wrong for the original CPU. So - the only bit which he did to make sure it was done right, he did wrong.

Comment Re:Seven years already? (Score 1) 22

Blue LEDs are ridiculously over-used. Presumably because they were last to the party manufacturers think they're terribly cool and stick unnecessary ones everywhere, and as you say they disrupt sleep.

Let's start a "Campaign for sensible LED usage" and press for the return of red and green ones (nicely dimmed).

Comment Re:Much of the world? (Score 1) 252

That is how England used to be at one time (I assume before adoption of before Greenwich Mean Time).

Well, it's how everywhere used to be - well, almost. There weren't time zones as such, certainly not stepped at 15 minute intervals or anything like it. Everywhere had its own local time, calculated by observation from when the sun was at its zenith, and set on sun dials. Mechanical clocks took their time from that. There was also far less dependence on clock time. To use, 6pm in the summer is the "same time" as 6pm in the winter (ignoring DST issues) but before the imposition of standardised time the view would have been far more that dusk in the summer was the same time as dusk in the winter. Dawn and dusk were just much further apart in the summer.

But the train companies didn't like the complexity the lack of a coordinated time brought to creating timetables.

A bit of a misrepresentation. It would be well nigh impossible to create a timetable without a fixed frame of reference against which to create it. It wasn't that they didn't like it - it was kind of a necessity. True enough though that the railways drove the standardisation of time - at least on land. Standardisation of time at sea was also very important, and must have happened earlier because it's vital for accurate navigation.

Comment What nonsense (Score 2) 199

what most people want, what most people lust for is 1Gbps speeds with less than 10 milliseconds of latency...

Really? Who are these "most people"? What are they planning to do with this startling performance?

What most people really want is just a stable connection providing reliable performance. As with home broadband, anything above about 40 Mbps is not going to be noticed. For what one actually does with a phone, 10 Mbps is ample.

Slashdot Top Deals

Thus spake the master programmer: "After three days without programming, life becomes meaningless." -- Geoffrey James, "The Tao of Programming"

Working...