Comment Re:Computers are tools. (Score 3, Insightful) 49
It seems logical then, if a computer accounting system is used in a place of work, such as a post office, the people operating the computer and submitting the accounting reports should be responsible, particularly for large scale and repeated errors, which seems to be the case here. No one will be charged for one wrong number on a balance sheet (unless it was clearly deliberate). The fact that these people were charged criminally suggests large scale and multiple discrepancies. It seems that regardless of "buggy software" they should bear some responsibility.
It's not quite clear what you're trying to say here. Who do you mean by "the people operating the computer"? If you mean the senior management in the post office then fine, yes, they should be held accountable. The people actually entering the information though had no choice or control at all. What happened was they entered all their transactions during the course of the day and then the system said they should have £N in the till, and in fact they had only £N - X in the till. The P.O. accused them of stealing the £X, and they had absolutely no way of demonstrating that they hadn't.
What boggles the mind is that the software must have been developed by people who had absolutely no experience of accounting systems. It shouldn't be possible for massive discrepancies like this to creep in. Everything must add up. If money was apparently disappearing from the shops, then it should have been mysteriously accumulating somewhere else. Basic double-entry book keeping procedures would have prevented all of this.