Comment One question... (Score 1) 94
If we play it backwards, does it tell us to worship the moon?
If we play it backwards, does it tell us to worship the moon?
You mean like this? http://jesusinlove.org/art-that-dares.php#gallery
Yes, a small smattering of idiots would probably want that website banned. If it were of Muhammad, instead of a small smattering of idiots wanting to ban it, you'd have people getting killed over it. That's the difference. While any group of large enough stature is guaranteed to have idiots in it, it seems when it comes to Islam, it's not the isolated jerkwads that go apeshit, it's a significant part of the population.
The problem is we like the idea of uncensored free speech and the notion that all religions deserve equal respect under the law. Those are great ideas. They are encapsulated in the first amendment to our (American) constitution. I personally agree with them myself. Unfortunately, they are also going to get us all killed.
There's plenty of religions in this world with plenty of problems, but for the most part, you can live peaceably enough with most of them. Only one of them in the present day flies planes into buildings, bombs nightclubs and embassies and hotels, cuts people's heads off on camera, and kills people over cartoons of their prophet.
Qur’an:9:5 - And when the sacred months have passed, then kill the polytheists wherever you find them and capture them and besiege them and sit in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they should repent, establish prayer, and give zakah, let them [go] on their way. Indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful.
[Note: Zakah is a concept that does not have a true english equivalent. The closest word that gives a very weak idea of zakah is "tithe".]
Qur’an:9:29 - Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture - [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled.
[Note: Jizyah is the protective tax unbelievers must pay to the Muslims or be killed.]
Qur’an:8:39 - And fight them until there is no fitnah and [until] the religion, all of it, is for Allah. And if they cease - then indeed, Allah is Seeing of what they do.
[Note: Fitnah means "disbelief".]
Long story short, there is no "moderation" in Islam. Either you kill and subjugate non-believers, or you are not following the tenets of your faith. They (in general) are actively trying to do just what those verses say.
Either we drop the notion ourselves and fight back, or the Muslims remove it from us when they take control, but in either case, the idea of all religions being equal will cease to exist, and any society that holds that belief until the end, will end with it. It is not the fittest trait, and it will become extinct.
Amen to that. I learned it the hard way. My brother was arrested, and I witnessed the incident. Things I told the cops I didn't know for sure, and wrote in my statement that I did not see parts of the event and was not sure and only guessing at certain details, ended up being used against him as if I had stated them as absolute fact. And my appeals to the contrary did nothing. So, yes, I learned. I understand not all cops are bad guys, but don't expect me to ever say anything to any of them without an attorney present ever again, whether I am a suspect or merely a witness. Because they effectively lied their asses off using my words out of context to do it.
What sort of checks are in place to make sure it's only used for legitimate purposes?
What constitutes "legitimate"? After all, with changing political whims, what is "legal" today could be "illegal" tomorrow, and suddenly a "legitimate" use becomes much less so, even if it is technically "legal". Godwin's law aside, Nazi Germany was following it's own laws in most of what it did, but I doubt most people would call any of it "legitimate". Give a government a tool, and it will abuse it eventually.
The government has no need to know where I am at any given point of the day, and trashing the privacy rights of the many to catch the few isn't the way to do it. Therefore, in my determination, there is no "legitimate" use for this. But, that's just my (and history's) opinion.
More likely it was a default or free add on when they bought it and they're just playing with it.
My car was in the shop a couple years back, and the loaner had a remote starter on it. I did the exact same thing, starting it as I walked up to it. Not cause I had to, but merely because I could, and it was kinda fun.
I'm a geek, I had a gadget, of course I was gonna play with it. I don't miss it on my car, and probably wouldn't pay to add it to my next one, but, if it came for free, I'd be doing the same thing.
No. The reason you didnt feel the uncanny valley was because it wasnt real. It was so far from real that your brain didnt find the twisted smurf creatures disturbing.
Actually, there *was* a part of the movie with the uncanny valley feeling, at least for me. The part near the end when the humans are laying under the tree. They definitely gave off uncanny vibes. At least to me. The blue people, sure, they can look like whatever, they're not human. They aren't uncanny because they only comparison we have is to themselves. But the humans, well, they didn't quite make it far enough to make it out of the valley in those scenes.
My first thought on reading the summary was that Serverloft was a bunch of tools. As I read more and realized the press release was probably a hoax, it made me think. I know the US and Canada have different laws, and IANAL, but if this were the US, I would tend to think Serverloft would have a decent case of libel against them. They can claim "parody" all they want, but if I had merely skimmed the surface, and not read deeper, Severloft woulda been stuck with a negative connotation for me all because these a holes want to screw around. How many of Serverloft's customers read that press release and immediately went and checked if their sites were up? How many are currently looking for a new provider right now? I am all for free speech. If I say "Company A sucks" then fine. Too bad for them. (In the US, of course, I'm sure some company's attorney would want to sue you over voicing that opinion.) But to say they killed 4500 customers in a knee jerk reaction when they didn't? That is not the same thing at all. That can have actual damages. And if I were Serverloft, I'd be consulting someone about it.
Yes, but that requires work and thinking, and no one wants to do either of those anymore. Too little time anyway what with the kid's soccer practice and music lessons, and getting some time in at the gym and don't forget those new sitcoms on tv, after putting in a 50-60 hour work week. We're a nation of people who can't form a thought deeper than a two minute soundbite and you expect them to actually do research and weigh facts and report in a blog both sides of an issue? Good luck with that.
Car and Driver published a study in which they compared reading and writing text messages with drunk driving. They only tested reaction times, not vehicle control. But, in general, reading and writing texts led to worse reaction times than being intoxicated. Decent and short read.
http://tinyurl.com/candtextingwhiledriving
As another posted mentioned though, enforcement will be the real issue. Sounds like it will be more post crash cell phone log analysis to see if you were texting than anything they can pull you over for. Because unless you're doing it in a very obvious manner, there's no real way to tell you're doing it until you crash.
Nah, I've HAD the ATM screw up before, and record a deposit twice. The bank happily deducted it from my account later. I've also had an ATM record a withdrawal three times for the one transaction. Took me a couple weeks of back and forth for them to get it all straightened out. So, the ATMs *do* screw up, but the banks don't care because in the end they don't lose any money. The only one that suffers is the customer (by being out my $$ for two weeks).
I'm not sure anyone would want exclusive rights to the derivative work I make based on a burrito.
Have you heard what the RIAA is selling these days? Don't be so hasty in your pronouncements.
The key elements in human thinking are not numbers but labels of fuzzy sets. -- L. Zadeh