Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment That would never actually happen. (Score 3, Informative) 157

There's no reason to think the melted core will get that far down, or even burn through the concrete floor, or even leave the reactor vessel in any sort of coherent form. Chernobyl's overheated core just spread through the lower parts of the structure (look for the 'elephant's foot' picture), Three Mile island's core was scraped off the inside of the reactor vessel, having only blued the metal.

'Corium' is basically molten ceramic (The fuel is a uranium-oxide matrix.) It has such poor heat conducting properties that during normal operations, it could be 3000F in the center of a pellet, and 650F on the surface of the cladding- 3/16" away from the center.

Comment Re:We tried this with AT&T already (Score 1) 324

President Kennedy was assassinated by communist defector Lee Harvey Oswald, not the CIA.

The Real Culprits

In 1963, a popular Democratic president was assassinated by a Marxist named Oswald, who had actually defected to the Soviet Union and returned to the U.S. with a Soviet wife, was an active member of the Fair Play for Cuba Committee, and had attempted to assassinate a right-wing general named Edwin Walker earlier in the year.

Yet those who write history found these facts inconvenient. They created a different history ...

Comment Re:since when is the FBI a spy agency? (Score 1) 324

Two things. First, the actual misconduct was on the part of Senator Wyden.

Second, the "LOVEINT" issue is misconduct, not an approved NSA action. The people that engage in that are subject to discipline, which generally means they lose their job and security clearance. That has a significant negative impact on their career options.

Comment Re:Author doesn't understand the NSA (Score 1) 324

The size of the facility, the capabilities listed by NARUS, and the
required cooling that is massive for the MULTIPLE centers show
that its a enormously powerful tracking system that tracks FAR more
then what they are admitting too.

Maybe you haven't heard, but there are nearly 200 countries in the world, most of them have a military, many host some groups that could be a threat, some countries are actually hostile, and a few aim nuclear weapons at the US or its allies. That makes for a lot of military units, ships, planes, submarines, missiles, and terrorist groups to keep track of. That makes for a lot of radio, radar, satellite, and network traffic to capture and analyze for intelligence, threats, and countermeasures. On top of that you can add concerns about various wars and conflicts that could have an impact of the US and its allies: a war between Japan and China, for example, or China and Taiwan. There is a lot to capture and analyze, and you don't seem to be acknowledging that.

Comment Netflix should get benefit from desirability (Score 4, Insightful) 289

Netflix is breaking the long standing status quo. Last I checked, they accounted for ~30% of ALL of the traffic on the internet. Obviously that is going to skew the metrics, and that is why Netflix is trying to push their own CDN. I do not know the particulars there. IMO, if Netflix expects ISPs to pay for their CDN, they are on drugs.

Why? A lot of people might only get internet, or faster internet anyway, BECAUSE of netflix.

If I were not streaming stuff on Netflix I might very well just use a cellular internet connection and not get cable internet at all. Netflix is helping the ISP's make money, and Netflix should gain some benefit from that fact as a result.

Comment Where is your Network Neutrality God now? (Score 1) 289

So how exactly is Network Neutrality going to fix the ACTUAL problems we are having instead of the problems we are pretending we have?

It's not. You can't force a company to buy more bandwidth, unless you want to expand Obamacare to mandate ISP's by a "platinum" bandwidth package from back haul providers.

Comment Net Neutrality laws? (Score 3, Insightful) 289

I've been saying this for ages! Even mentioned this here on slashdot. Peering is peering. They are not degrading performance by configuration, they just let the link get congested. How do any of the proposed net neutrality laws address this issue? Answer is, they don't. To me that means that Net Neutrality laws are about something different than neutrality. More likely with government regulation, it becomes Net Control. With that, increased stiffing and limiting reaction to market dynamics, not improving it.

Comment Re:What would happen if they just let it meltdown? (Score 2) 157

why not just let the thing meltdown? It would essentially bury the fuel. After it drops down a 1000' or so, fill the hole in with cement. I wouldn't be too worried about volcanic eruptions, radiation is what keeps the earth core nice and soft.

The most important reason is that 'corium' isn't actually hot enough to burn through the earth like that, nor does it conduct heat all that well, even if any part of it became hot enough.

The integrity of the fuel rods is challenged at 2200F (zircaloy-water reaction, which released the hydrogen that caused the reactor building roofs to blow off on three of the Daichi units.)

Steel melts at about 2600F. Concrete breaks down at about 1800F.

In addition, the fuel is a uranium-oxide mix, a sort of ceramic. This class of material is generally known for poor thermal conductivity. That's why the pellets are the size of a pencil eraser, they need to be small and have a high surface area in order to conduct heat from the center of the pellet- which might be at 3000F in normal operations- to the fuel cladding and into the reactor coolant, which might be around 600F.

Anyway, from what I know about western reactors (it's my line of work, but i'm not a reactor engineer per se), I seriously doubt the fuel would 'burn' through steel or concrete. The fission products escape because of physical destruction to the facility caused by the Tsunami, or because of relief valves that limit reactor coolant system pressure, or primary containment structure pressure.

Chernobyl's release was due to a massive overpressure event that physically broke the reactor vessel. Nothing ever burned through concrete (check out the photos of the 'elephant's foot')

Three Mile Island's core was found in the bottom of the reactor vessel; a small amount of fission products was released by mis-operation of support systems. The integrity of the reactor vessel was never threatened, though the containment building (much larger than Daichi primary containment structures) withstood several hydrogen burns.

Comment Re:Author doesn't understand the NSA (Score 1) 324

There are exceptions to the doctrine of the fruit of the poisonous tree.

This doctrine is subject to three of important exceptions. The evidence will not be excluded (1) if it was discovered from a source independent of the illegal activity; (2) its discovery was inevitable; or (3) if there is attenuation between the illegal activity and the discovery of the evidence. -- ref

Slashdot Top Deals

Make sure your code does nothing gracefully.

Working...