Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:stupid (Score 1) 558

You could start off with your common-or-garden variety spam filter and increase the linguistic sophistication for your defences from there ...

C'mon, given the technology that exists to spy on you everyday, CAPTCHAs are a really dumb way to deal with this problem. I mean, if we can land a man on the moon ... oh yeah we can't any more, forgot.

Comment Re:Rupert Murdoch can die in a hole already. (Score 1) 327

Ahem. Tell that to these companies: http://www.nceo.org/articles/employee-ownership-100

You seem to think that this is some experiment. When in actually, employee-owned companies are the most stable and oft times most profitable like John Lewis Partnership. http://www.johnlewispartnership.co.uk/

Comment Any libertarians going to defend GS? (Score 1) 186

Just curious. They're such a powerful organization that it's difficult to imagine anything short of a strong Federal Gov't reigning them in. I know the argument is that they can only survive because of a Strong Federal Gov't favoring them, but I really see that as a chicken/egg situation. In this case I think they GS chicken came first. e.g. the gov't is a convenient tool for them but in it's absence they'd have plenty of other ways to exercise leverage on us all. They control a good chunk of all wealth in this country after all, and in general you do what the Rich guy says because if not you get fired, and in America your entire quality of life depends on your job. The golden rule: He with the Gold makes the Rules.

So I say again, any Libertarians gonna step up for 'ole GS?

Comment Re:Why read newspapers? (Score 1) 178

Yeah, but my point was that now that they're all owned by a few big corporations they've stopped doing that. The Malfeasance and corruption benefits the mega corps. And if you think the mega corps aren't interested in your local politics you're dead wrong. Local elections decide how the districts get drawn for state elections. That's how the corps have locked in the House/Senate. The only election they can't completely own is the Presidential, but since it's just one they can pour so much money into it (over $1 billion last time) it doesn't matter.

Comment Re:Rupert Murdoch can die in a hole already. (Score 2) 327

I was watching a Werner Herzog documentary about trappers in the Siberian taiga and, long story short, one trapper was complaining about trappers who will trap before some kind of critter's coat was really ready, on the basis that a few coins in his pocket now is better than someone else getting full price for the pelt later if they trap it instead of him.

Indeed, tragedy of the meta-trap.

It's universal, and it's the reason why I'm a liberal and not an anarchist; without adequate restrictions on commerce it rapidly becomes first and foremost an instrument of tyranny.

I'm with you.

Conceivably, a local game warden could enable the community to maximize their overall pelt yield — though, in this particular environment, I imagine that the pervasive threat of regulatory capture could make the position cost-prohibitive to fill.

Comment Why read newspapers? (Score 4, Insightful) 178

Seriously. What information do they have that is at all useful? In the old days we had muckrakers telling us all the awful things our politicians were doing. These days since they're all owned by big corps they don't want to step on any toes. After all, you won't last long if you say bad things about the boss. It feels like all they have left is sports news I can get from the source, some 30 year old comics and classifieds full of H1-B bait :(.

Comment I don't think the Communists were right (Score 1) 187

I don't see communism as inevitable. That assumption is based on the idea that there's only so much people will put up with. But if you lack the power and resources to do anything about it then you'll put up with anything. You don't have a choice. If 20 guys with riot gear and the training to use it want you to do what they say, you're going to do what they say. No amount of wishful thinking will change that.

Recycling can't really be done on the backend like that. It requires too many chemicals and produces too much waste. You can't get people to design products that either last or are easily recyclable because in a 'Free' market those products cost more. If you subsidize them you've got socialism again, and if you're going to do that I still think you might as well go whole hog and do it right...

Comment Based on the reviews I've read (Score 1) 86

it doesn't work on Windows, much less Linux. I know, I know. They'll fix it in software. But that said, right now my shoulders are at rest while I type. The same is true for when I reach for my mouse. Give me one of these and now I end up moving my arms/shoulders into uncomfortable positions. Plus I lose all tactile feedback. If they want to give me a mouse w/o a mouse it might be cool. But I'm still not sold on the whole 'Minority Report' thing.

Comment It's fine if brick n mortor goes away (Score 1) 187

if we're willing to accept solutions to the problems that creates. I see two problems: 1. lost jobs and 2. price increases when competition goes away.

Basically, the modern capitalist economy breaks down in the face of progress. I realize it's hard to get past that realization. In school I was never taught even the concept that there were alternatives to Adam Smith style 'competition makes everything better' capitalism. I don't mean I wasn't taught competing systems, I mean the notion that there _were_ alternatives wasn't taught. Capitalism was and is a tautology.

Automation is making labor obsolete. It's taking longer than we expected. Some things turned out to be trickier. But it's happening. So what are we gonna do? We still want all this stuff (books, movies, appliances, etc). The first world got by for 20 years or so by sending our slums to China. But we're running out of work. Foxconn's using robots now. China's losing out to poorer East Asian countries. We're all in a race to the bottom.

Given that our entire society is built around a 'if you don't work you don't get to eat' model, I really only see two options. Socialism and redistribution of wealth or abject poverty for all but a lucky few. (BTW, If you're reading /. in your spare time you're not one of those lucky few. ).

I'm open to alternatives, but all the ones I've heard from my libertarian buddies are either pipe dreams where people share their wealth in ways they have no reason too and never have in all of civilization, or just boil down to a round about way of achieving socialism. When I point that out they usually change the subject or just say 'well, screw it, I got mine. Let 'em die'.

Comment Either way (Score 1) 187

I keep hearing this argument. That we shouldn't use the gov't and democracy to better our lives because the corps will abuse it. Newsflash, they already _are_ abusing it. Seriously. You have absolutely nothing to lose here. There's only to possible outcomes there. Does it really matter if the jackboot at your neck is a Free Market Jackboot (tm) or belongs to the gov't. At least with the gov't option you had a chance...

Slashdot Top Deals

Always draw your curves, then plot your reading.

Working...