Yeah, they push to it. They don't commit to it. Every now and again they push somewhere else.

That was good advice.

When functions trained by amateurs best hand-made functions written by top experts in the field, you've gone past "bad programming" into something else.

You mean the impeachment prosecution where a mountain of evidence was uncovered and the president's defense was an \blatant lie?

Every single politician and every single reporter in Washington DC knows Biden's trip to Ukraine was above board.

... by Russian and Republican moles in the state department, as recommended to her by Colin Powell. It had no value in keeping emails from law enforcement.

There were three bits of classified information sent *to* someone on her server. What that tells anyone with a brain is that she wasn't using the server for classified communications.

Are you talking about the same Russiagate where several members of the Trump campaign and admin went to prison and the lead prosecutor basically said the only reason the president wasn't indicted was DOJ policy not to indict presidents?

Hilary may have been unethical, but not over Benghazi or her emails, which is all almost any voter will bring up if you ask for her negatives.

Where's the Democrats' Benghazi, then? This kind of relentless, dishonest attack over nothing is relatively new. New Gingrich started it and it's been SOP for Republicans ever since.

You ever hear the saying "Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me"?

In simple terms, it means don't believe a liar. There's no reason to give Giuliani or this character the time of day. That's not a partisan position.

If Trump claims that he knows better than anyone about vaccines, and he will, then anyone with a brain will switch to antivaxx.

Computer people always think in terms of computers. Other countries have human intel tying Russia to a variety of hacks.

We've done it before. It's a loooong way from impossible. They could, of course, do things like keep registration databases offline. It would make life harder but it would be safe and much easier than going pure paper.

Question is, how much is our democracy worth? What's the point of saving a billion dollars if it means Putin decides who can vote?

I haven't read any of the original sources, but you only need to look at almost every other country in the world to see what an aggressive response would do.

Why the hell do you need a source to tell you what's obvious?

I don't understand why you don't find this news believable, since he's been saying similar things for years on the record.