So, what you are saying is they should have arrested and tried him for suspicion of rape and not her for battery with a deadly weapon and attempted murder for hitting him in the head with a coffee mug? After all, there are two stories here. Hers and his. She has a black eye and a story of attempted rape. He has a story to go along with the bleeding head wound that she states he had.

And he had a bleeding head wound from being struck in the head with a coffee mug. BTW, Constitution boy, why should he have to when we are all innocent until proven guilty. You know, unlike what you are doing right now which is assuming he is guilty and asking him to prove his innocence.

Kind of hard to prosecute a case where there is no evidence of rape, no witnesses, and the alleged attacker has escaped the room with bleeding head wound while she has a black eye. This is literally a case of he said, she said. Why should they take her word she fought off a rape attempt and not his word that she got mad at him, "pre-emptively attacked" him with a coffee mug when his back was turned, he fought her off and escaped the room?

It stopped being self defense when you stated you would repeated smash his head into a table until he blood spurted on your shirt.

If you hit them first, you are the one committing violent assault and the person you hit would be, according to you, well within their rights to beat you down and stomp you to death.

No, it was an attempted rape at a security con.

You sound like a violent paranoid psychopath.

No, you wouldn't.

bwahahahah. Oh, you post is soooo funny. I almost believed you were serious instead of a troll.

Because it contains classified information.

Read the fucking RFC, asshole. I included a link to it so you could see what the standard actually says. The meaning of the word "standard" doesn't change just because your are fanboy. Go home, shithead, you are a stupid hypocrite.

Maybe you should try reading the second link from the summary and take a look at the standard heads. What you would find is that the standard is "no-cache". Chrome and Firefox use the non-standard "no-store". But, guess which browser supports three different headers, and the only one to actually support the standard? IE.

If you are a sysadmin who hates his job and/or employer and you are worth your salt, you find a new job, leave, and let all the people you know why you left. Leave little notes on the system and in the documentation that lets your successor know why you left. You don't do petty, unethical, and possibly criminal things. People who do that shit are the reason IT people have a bad reputation. Grow the fuck up, assholes. Either suck it and do your job or find a new job, quit, and leave them without stealing or destroying data or creating more problems for them and the person or people who will be replacing you.

You don't know the meaning of the word "entrap", you stupid fuck.

No credible chain of custody, so anything they "preserved" is worthless.

Put a bunch of whiney, selfish, over-indulged, arrogant, ethically-challenged, over-grown children who never got over believing they are special and everyone is exactly equal because everyone gets a trophy and have a group history of disrespecting other people's work and money, "should be given the power to spend corporate money on research and development" which means no pre-spending oversight.

What could possibly go wrong?

Again, I suggest you check your local laws.

Oh, and how is this different from walking a drug detecting dog outside a suspected grow house?