Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment You def know it when you see it (Score 5, Interesting) 119

Like the examples from Claudine Gay's work that are unattributed carbon copies from other's work.
Image examples here: https://freebeacon.com/campus/...

This case does not merit major academic institutional soul-searching* or legal hairsplitting. A student getting caught doing these things would at least get an F, probably get sent to the Honor Court, and who knows, maybe even expelled.

*Well, maybe soul-searching could be merited if it takes forms like "how did we ever put a person like this in charge?", "are many of our disciplines complete jokes lacking any form of rigor or integrity?", etc?

Comment What "perils"? (Score 1) 55

TFA doesn't mention any misuse of open source software.
The closest thing to "perils" might be the licensing changes it describes, but...well, adjust. It's not like "forcing major changes that make everybody re-evaluate whether they want to keep using it" never happens with commercial software.

Comment Compared to other industries though? (Score 2, Insightful) 100

These sorts of posts almost never offer comparisons with other areas of industry, manufacturing, etc.

TFA says,
> "estimated the carbon footprint of training a single early large language model (LLM) such as GPT-2 at about 300,000kg of CO2 emissions – the equivalent of 125 round-trip flights between New York and Beijing. "

125 flights doesn't sound that bad for a massive undertaking like training ChatGPT.
How does this compare with what a typical factory emits in a year?
How does the power consumption compare with, say, an auto manufacturing plant?

Slashdot Top Deals

There are two ways to write error-free programs; only the third one works.

Working...