This is that stupid thing where "experts" are horrified that reality hasn't been perfectly equitable, so some races, historically disadvantaged, have ended up with higher levels of criminality. And so they pretend that the way to equalize the situation is to ignore the criminals in some areas, which ironically keeps those areas disadvantaged and perpetuates the problem.

Ah yes. Net Neutrality. Remember that time it went away and the whole internet shut off and we all died?

20% of Wyomings power is from wind. 75% is from coal.

And 90% is from right-wing bullshit that the faux "cowboys" eat up because they think it makes them look manly, when it fact, they're some of the biggest welfare queens in the country. Their government ranks #5 in the states most dependent on Federal money, then they brag about not having a state income tax.

https://wallethub.com/edu/stat...

The fact that more Twitter files exposes are coming out even between your last comment and this one shows just how much of a liar you are to claim "The twitter files didn't prove anything". You can't make past tense claims about something that is still ongoing.

Boomer? That's hilarious. The Trump Administration only made one request to Twitter for censorship, and it was over the food shortages. And yes, it was just as odious as any of the other censorship requests, which Democrats and lefty bureaucrats were making frequently and consistently for any reason they didn't like, including jokes.

So you didn't read them? Or maybe you did the same thing as the media and only read the first one and pretended the others didn't exist. They're up to I think 18 releases now.

Wow. You really do keep yourself blind, don't you?

Democrats define "abuses" as the platforms not censoring enough of anything they don't like. There was evidence before, but the Twitter files definitively prove this. Republicans define abuse as the censorship.

You mean that study that the Washington Post also just reported on? Definitely right wing conspiracy stuff. Just keep your eyes closed and move on.

Are they also going to investigate why the owner of FTX was the second largest democratic party donor, next to Soros?

Will they also investigate why the CEO of FTX gave $24 million to Republicans?

https://www.politico.com/news/...

"Bankman-Fried was among the most significant donors to Democrats during the cycle, distributing more than $40 million through direct contributions and super PACs. Salame gave roughly $24 million to Republicans."

It can't be because social media companies were all over-hiring during times of easy money...

Yeah, you need to have hashcodes for the version of software and all sorts of other stuff, not disagreeing with that.

Dominion Voting Systems is almost a perfect how-to-not example for secure elections. Getting everything open source is a good start.

Os Os baby.

"You know you're a nerd when you store DNA in your fridge,"

Real nerds store DNA in their tube socks.