i sincerely hope your post is a joke. and if so, i like it very much

but they fork faster. try it: http://9fans.net/archive/2009/02/422

the documentation directory is empty, but the original pdp1 code is there as well as a pdp1 emulator to run it on: http://golang.org/src/pkg/exp/spacewar/

well they're both exceptions to op's definition whichever way you phrase it, right? yes

like i said, much of it is written in limbo. there is more to an operating system than a kernel, especially in an os such as inferno which tries to do as much code as possible in userspace

the go authors have a decades-old practice of deliberately choosing annoying names "in the Bell Labs tradition of selecting names that make marketeers wince."

http://plan9.bell-labs.com/wiki/plan9/FAQ/index.html

inferno is another exception to your definition of systems language. much of it is written in limbo, a direct ancestor of go. it too has automatic memory management and no pointer arithmatic and it works just fine

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inferno_(operating_system)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limbo_(programming_language)

why wonder when you can look it up? http://golang.org/doc/go_spec.html

tl;dr yes, it has goto

well that's why it's an open debate. in my opinion the police should operate much the way they do now but be way less aggressive with suspects. the goal of anarchism is to give everyone the freedom to do anything but infringe upon another's rights. i think the current system is capable of that with some tweaking. a system based upon the current police and courts would be fine with me

it's what to do with people who have infringed on someone else's rights where it gets tricky. do you punish them? reform them? how do you make someone reform? is that even ethical? how can you be sure someone has reformed? do you exile them? do you otherwise separate them from the rest of society? these decisions would be made by a direct democracy of course

it's a tough problem though. i have no idea. but it's not like any other society has solved the problem adequately either

hello again

according to liddell and scott's greek lexicon, ho archos means leader, chief, or commander. it can evidently also mean rectum, which i didn't before now. i am both an anarchist and a fifth semester ancient greek student, if that convinces you of whatever of expertise i have

anarchists make a distinction between governments that rule the people and governing bodies with no real means and no desire to force compliance with their judgments. the united states congress for instance makes laws (typically without the support of the people they claim to represent) and if someone chooses not to comply with that law, that person will be made to comply by the police and by the courts. the ietf on the other hand is a relatively democratic* organization that makes judgments but has no way to enforce them nor does it want to enforce them. one can choose to follow an ietf standard or to make up one's own way of doing things with no consequences

how best to provide a military and police force in an anarchist society, as far as i'm aware, is still up for debate. in the past, anarchist militaries have elected their officers, with squads choosing their squad leader from their own ranks and being able to recall that elected leader and choose another at any time. it's a meritocracy basically. where social hierarchies must exist, that's pretty much how it works

* or so i'm assuming, i don't know much about the ietf's internal structure

if russian ships were blockading the united states, european ships would have every right to bypass the blockade to bring goods to the us. naval blockades are an illegal act, and anyone is free to evade them if they choose. perhaps they won't succeed, but that is another matter

where did you see that gaza didn't want them there? i hadn't read that

rational or not, i would certainly appreciate someone sending me medical supplies if i lived in a warzone

what's so loony about that? people can bring medical supplies to gaza (if i'm remembering the event correctly) if they want to. they have the freedom to do so, you could say

and neither evidently do limited liability enterprises. if they didn't like paying the costs associated with being an llc, they could simply choose not to incorporate. they don't do that of course because they find the benefits of incorporation to outweigh the costs

there was a time when libertarianism and anarchism referred to the same philosophy. i support taking back the term libertarian from the Libertarian Party and cato just as much as i support taking back "anarcho"-capitalism from murry rotharbard and taking back socialism from the marxists

henry kissenger won the peace prize once. for negotiating an end to war crimes he himself commited. the peace prize has very little to do with peace in general

would you elaborate please?