I thought he spent his college years in a love triangle with Vladimir Putin and Linus.

Your right about that.

If it's the only evidence and it's obviously fake, then that supports a fit up hypothesis.

As with the Reiser's of this world, once you've got the guy who actually did it, all sorts of forensic and circumstantial evidence pops up.

I am? I didn't know that. An atheist brought up as a Welsh methodist is really a Mormon? Where do I go to buy my magic underwear?
 

Thank you. I resisted the temptation to correct the poster's use of the English term 'beg the question'.

Well. http://www.amazon.com/She-Needed-Killing-Series-ebook/dp/B00DZX38EO

Next time I murder my wife, I'm going to plant obviously fake evidence on my own computer linking me to the crime.

Nobody said it'd be the user of the device that employs those circumvention methods.

So when can we kill HDMI alltogether?

Yes. You missed entropy. It all turns messy in the end.

Yes but they don't stop once they've formed. They keep on turning - asynchronously - or maybe not asynchronously.

You obviously don't have to work with anything on the web, because the pain inflicted by Microsoft on the countless web developers over the years is still fresh and ongoing for many. There are quire a few people who are only a few more "It doesn't work in IE6"s away from a murderous rampage. That's also ignoring everything else Microsoft has pulled in the 15 years since.

I have yet to see anyone say Sony is an Angel, but the truth is most people didn't use the Other OS feature, and for those that didn't the change didn't do anything to cripple what they use the PS3 for which is usually either watching movies, playing games, or both. There are things I don't like about the changes Sony has made over the life of the PS3, but frankly, Microsoft seems to be worse in just about every way that matters to me. On the other hand, calling someone an idiot, a fool, and insane for not agreeing with your opinion is juvenile and belligerent.

It's not just any strong belief, after all, I don't think there are too many people who are extremely violent because really orchids are the best kind of flower. I think the proper word is ideology. The kind of violence you are referring to requires a strong set of beliefs that reinforce each other and it requires an enemy ideology (or ideologies). The violence is justified by fear and/or hatred of the enemy.

It doesn't matter whether the enemy is libertarianism, collectivism, capitalism, Islam, religion, athieism, liberalism, progressives, conservatism, environmentalism, industrialism, or people with different colored skin. Some people will try to marshal fear and hatred to enhance their own power, and intentionally or not, it will spawn violence. These people will routinely used cherry-picked facts or quotes to justify their position, sometimes ignoring the obvious message to focus on minutae that can justify their current activities. They may do it consciously to manipulate others or unconsciously to justify their behaviour, but tiny little facts that match their ideology will be found to be more important than the massive important ones that contradict it.

And display port exists specifically so they don't have to pay the royalties for HDMI,

The Beagle Boards look pretty good, but they lack a SATA controller and don't really carry enough memory. I'll keep an eye on them though.