With the failure of so many blue cities and states, it should be increasingly more obvious that their philosophy/ideology is wrong
The states with the lowest GDP growth in 2012 were South Dakota, New Mexico, Wyoming, Delaware, and Connecticut. (2 blue, 2 red, 1 purple.)
The states with the highest GDP growth in 2012 were North Dakota, Texas, Oregon, Washington, and Minnesota. (2 red, 3 blue)
Just the fact that ND and SD are on opposite ends of that list should convince you that economic vitality has almost nothing to do with political partisanship.
they plan to re-engineer the Flu virus to come in pastel colors and to manufacture vitamin D.
-
access to the RAW DATA was NOT available
Previously, you could have used your ignorance as an excuse. Now you're just lying. And apparently neither you or Lonny Eachus have enough intellectual integrity to retract your latest steaming pile of civilization-paralyzing misinformation. This flood of misinformation isn't just staining "Jane Q. Public's" sock puppet legacy. It's also staining Lonny Eachus's real human legacy. Please stop.
it was uncovered that most of the original data could (later) be obtained from the original sources
I didn't notice this comment before I wrote mine, otherwise I'd have been forced to correct this incorrect claim too. Again, the majority of data in CRU's dataset "are derived from the same freely-available raw data sets used by NOAA and NASA." Most of the data was already in the public domain, which is why the FOIA blizzard against CRU was so hysterically pointless.
Years ago, I explained in excruciating detail that this played absolutely no role in evaluating the quality of CRU's work because the majority of data in CRU's dataset "are derived from the same freely-available raw data sets used by NOAA and NASA." The Muir Russell review reproduced the necessary code in two days without any help from CRU.
And, of course, this isn't CRU's fault because “the authority for releasing unpublished raw data to third parties should stay with those who collected it.” Oddly, many people seem to ignore this point and blame CRU.
By the way, I debunked the misinformation that you and Lonny Eachus were spreading about Cowtan and Way 2013. Feel free to retract your misinformation (or double down on it) here. Lonny Eachus is welcome to do the same, but for some reason he never replied.
provide DNA samples for a project that determines what percentage of drivers are operating under the influence of drugs or alcohol at given times.
How the fuck - I mean HOW THE FUCK - are you expected to determine if someone is under the influence of drink or drugs by checking their DNA?
That would imply that every time you take a drink (or smoke anything, including tobacco), you induce DNA changes in your cheek cells. And therefore, get cancer. Now, I do know that both drinking and smoking are associated with increased cancer rates, but they're not 100% cancer rates.
Someone has been writing absolute shit "science journalism".
It went back up again a bit after last week's dip (to about 975). That was all the idiots thinking they were going to make money after the Chinese thing caused a crash...
Isn't that what the white-collar thieves and scoundrels call a "dead cat bounce".
The same researchers plan to do a study on the new electronic social networking phenomena. All of the test subjects will be given pagers for two hours a day.
-
"If anything can go wrong, it will." -- Edsel Murphy