Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:"NFT Shooter"? (Score 2) 29

What the heck does that even mean?

From TFS:

MadWorld’s gameplay is centered around integrating Web3 technologies, which allows for the ownership, enhancement, and trading of tokenized representations of real-world locations. This feature encourages players to create clans and work together or compete for essential resources that are spread across the vast game world. Clans can acquire these resources by paying tributes to NFT landowners using “Rounds,” the in-game currency. This mechanism not only fosters a sense of community and teamwork but also creates unique economic opportunities within the game by blending traditional gaming elements with the emerging field of digital assets.

If you were hoping they just shit out some worthless NFTs during gameplay, then I'm sorry to disappoint you. They seem to have added landlords as a way to extract more money from an FPS.

Comment Re:That's why its a budget phone... (Score 5, Informative) 56

The Moto G series didn't do this before. I liked them because they were okay phones with a fairly clean Android install and great battery life. They included some junk like wallpapers, their tutorials, and "dolby atmos" audio tuning, but no adware / third party sponsored crap. Unfortunately it looks like they're going the Samsung route now.

Comment Re:Fantastic (Score 4, Insightful) 62

We, as a culture, need to stop promoting and hiring based on things other than merit.

Boeing's problems aren't due to hiring the wrong color people. This is happening because McDonnell Douglas's predatory management took over the company and prioritized short-term profits over making top-tier products.

Comment Re:Cool "whiffle ball" rover (Score 1) 22

Great link, thank you! I really appreciate this kind of engineering - it's mechanically simple, stripped down to very few moving parts, but makes the absolute most of each one. The wobbling wheels are a clever way to dig out of soft terrain. Being so small, I would hope more lander missions can bring a couple of these along. They probably don't have great range, but I think they'll be invaluable for inspecting the main lander, and running over to get a close-up of some glint spotted in the main camera.

Comment A bit of napkin math (Score 3, Informative) 200

100 gallons of gasoline produce about 1 ton of CO2 when burned. Assuming this technique works and buries 1 net ton of CO2 for $100, that means it'll cost about $1 per gallon to clean up car emissions.

Likewise, you can get about 869 kWh per ton of CO2 from a coal plant, 2062 kWh per ton from a natural gas plant, or 13,745kWh per ton from a nuclear plant. Therefore you can clean up electrical generation for about $0.115/kWh for coal, $0.048/kWh for natural gas, or $0.007/kWh for nuclear. I've looked up enough numbers, but I'd assume renewables would be down there with nuke.

If you tack those costs on to the prices of electricity supplied by generators, you'll see a pretty rapid change in the "nuclear and renewables aren't cost-effective" mantra. Likewise, tack it onto the price of a gallon at the pump and you'll see an even faster push toward electric cars.

Those aren't the only ways to pay for it of course, but you have to pay for it somewhere (climate collapse is much more expensive in the long run). Pricing it in close to the source will get people eager to change sources in a hurry... and for those who can't, it's okay as long as they're paying to clean up their own mess.

Sources for CO2 emissions per (gallon, kWh):
https://www.epa.gov/greenvehic...
https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs...
https://www.dw.com/en/fact-che...

Slashdot Top Deals

User hostile.

Working...