Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Submission + - Windows 10 will soon allow direct access to Linux files (theinquirer.net)

AmiMoJo writes: Microsoft's Linux love-in continues with the announcement that, soon, you'll be able to access your Linux files directly from Windows. The company has confirmed that the next edition of Windows 10, due in April, will allow you to access your Linux files from the File Explorer and edit them using the command line.

You'll be able to type explorer.exe from within the Linux-in-Windows box, and up will pop a Windows File Explorer window, defaulted to your home Linux file directory. The post adds: "This includes operations such as: dragging files back and forth to other locations, copy and paste, and even interesting scenarios like using the context menu to open VSCode in a WSL directory!"

Submission + - Is Slashdot still relevant in today's online world? 3

Nabeel_co writes: I was talking to a co-worker about online communities, and we were bonding over our mutual hatred of Reddit and their voting system that rewards short dumb posts, and punishes original thinking.

I then held up Slashdot's MetaMod system as the pinnacle of comment voting systems, and that's where things went sideways...

I'm in my early 30s, and my coworker is barely in his 20s. His response was "What? Slashdot still exists? Why would you read such a garbage website with terrible UX straight out of the 90s."
I proceeded to explain that the community is why I stick around, and how MetaMod fosters this community. However, he insisted that if I wanted a good community, I should just read Hacker News.

So I put the question out to my fellow readers: Why do you stick around?

I think the fact that Slashdot has stood the test of time, and is easily 10 years older than even Reddit, and outlived sites like Digg, Livejournal, MySpace, and countless others, tells you how good the community is.

Submission + - Google Backtracks on Chrome Modifications That Would Have Crippled Ad Blockers (zdnet.com)

An anonymous reader writes: A study analyzing the performance of Chrome ad blocker extensions published on Friday has proven wrong claims made by Google developers last month, when a controversy broke out surrounding their decision to modify the Chrome browser in such a way that would have eventually killed off ad blockers and many other extensions.

The study, carried out by the team behind the Ghostery ad blocker, found that ad blockers had sub-millisecond impact on Chrome's network requests that could hardly be called a performance hit. Hours after the Ghostery team published its study and benchmark results, the Chrome team backtracked on their planned modifications.

Submission + - Tim May, Father of 'Crypto Anarchy,' Is Dead at 67 (reason.com)

SonicSpike writes: Tim May, co-founder of the influential Cypherpunks mailing list and a significant influence on both bitcoin and WikiLeaks, passed away last week at his home in Corralitos, California. The news was announced Saturday on a Facebook post written by his friend Lucky Green.

In his influential 1988 essay, "The Crypto Anarchist Manifesto," May predicted that advances in computer technology would eventually allow "individuals and groups to communicate and interact with each other" anonymously and without government intrusion. "These developments will alter completely the nature of government regulation [and] the ability to tax and control economic interactions," he wrote.

May became convinced that public-key cryptography combined with networked computing would break apart social power structures.

In September of 1988, May sat down at his Macintosh Plus "for an hour and a half" to bang out an essay loosely patterned after The Communist Manifesto. He titled it "The Crypto Anarchist Manifesto." Running 497 words, it was his most influential piece of writing.

"Just as the technology of printing altered and reduced the power of medieval guilds and the social power structure," he wrote, "so too will cryptologic methods fundamentally alter the nature of corporations and of government interference in economic transactions."

In September 1992, May and his friends Eric Hughes and Hugh Daniels came up with the idea of setting up an online mailing list to discuss their ideas. Within a few days of its launch, a hundred people had signed up for the Cypherpunks mailing list. (The group's name was coined by Hughes' girlfriend as a play on the "cyberpunk" genre of fiction.) By 1997, it averaged 30 messages daily with about 2,000 subscribers. May was its most prolific contributor.

May and Hughes, along with free speech activist John Gilmore, wore masks on the cover of the second issue of Wired magazine accompanying a profile by journalist Steven Levy, who described the Cypherpunks as "more a gathering of those who share a predilection for codes, a passion for privacy, and the gumption to do something about it."

The Cypherpunks list, which dissolved shortly after September 11, 2001 ("a lot of people got cold feet about talking about this stuff"), was deeply influential at a time when the U.S. government was fighting to keep public-key cryptography out of the hands of the public. WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was an active reader and participant on the list, contributing his first posts in 1995 under the name "Proff."

Assange's 2012 book Cypherpunks: Freedom and the Future of the Internet restated May's theory in grandiose terms, describing how "a strange property of the physical universe that we live in" (cryptography) made it possible to create "new lands barred to those who control physical reality."

Comment Re:Sounds like a new business for Amazon (Score 1) 134

I have used Redhsift in production for many years. Not my first choice, but great if someone is willing to pay.

It was froked from Redshift by some other company. AWS bought that and enhanced/integrated it with the rest of their products. As usual they did a good job.

It is really good technology, and no you cannot achieve the same with Postgres (as other comments are implying in this thread). As long as you have the money and read the fine manual, it will solve a lot of data problems at scale, with flexibility.

OTOH, An enitre thread could be written about AWS pricing strategy... I guess they don't have to worry about that themsleves.

Comment Re:We don't want abortion in open source. (Score 1) 522

Very few, if any, jokes are appropriate worldwide. If that is so, then what is the importance of this message? Should we stop making any jokes?

Nothing is acceptable in all contexts. And most things are acceptable in some context. Letting the author of the fucking code decide is one of the better ways to decide. My code, my choice!

Comment Re:BBC / other state broadcasters? (Score 1) 132

I thought that everybody in the UK with a TV set is already paying for the BBC by law (i.e. no choice). If this doesn't change then the BBC will keep producing good independent programming.

The question now is, if everything will be as before for you, why do you care if others get it for free? Is this some "justice" thing?

Comment Re:"because it originated from the wireless networ (Score 1) 547

You don't want anybody to talk to the cops, guilty OR innocent.

This is because if only one group talks to the cops it leads to information unraveling (i.e. innocent ppl talk -> if you shutup you admit you're guilty, so you better talk and get some better treatment or whatever.)

The only way the fifth works is if it works for everybody, otherwise it's useless.

Comment Re:Get serious about your selection process (Score 1) 163

To achieve this in SQL Server do this:
BEGIN TRANSACTION;
SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL REPEATABLE READ;
//update your table here
//.. wait as long as you want
COMMIT TRANSACTION; //when ready


Alternatively you can use the WITH( REPEATABLEREAD) table hint when you select (but you still have to use transactions).
There are also implicit transactions and a lot of other ways to control concurrency...

Comment Re:Amazon Pricing problems (Score 4, Interesting) 73

Actually there is no reason to be freaked out by their pricing. Just buy the number of instances that you need (one for example) and don't set up any auto-scaling. This way if you get slashdoted your instance will just fail as a normal server would and you will incur no charges. Also no service...

I have worked with amazon aws and with dedicated server providers. Amazon has been much faster and reliable.

Furthermore, the way to protect your life savings from a potential business failure is not through inefficient procurement practices. Just incorporate, otherwise you will be open to all kind of risks (must of it unknown to you, and uninsured)

Slashdot Top Deals

If you want to put yourself on the map, publish your own map.

Working...