I wonder, is it just doing "a new thing?" Can it also be new variations of things, combinations of new things and old things, combinations of old things and new ways ot do old things, etc,, that will alter that perception of how fast or slow time is passing?

(Does my ponderance even make sense?)

Definitely tricky - current "AI detection" is IMO inconsistent-to-dogshit in terms of accuracy, then there is issue of counter-measures being useds to train smarter systems that try to beat them.

Emphasizing "FREE" in all caps IMO doesn't do anything to address the points raised.

Citation needed? (Not being used by one proces =/= idle, the OS utilizing memory and other processes, you know, running are things). I question how many repeating this crap even sat through a computer operating system design class.

To be fair, it'd be an allegation of infringement if they go that route - am I misunderstanding it though in thinking it's more like YT is talking about a breach of contract angle?

Or, it should take when it needs it, and not force the OS to clean up after avoidable sloppines wherever it may be present in a user level application.

Maybe if they had more trust - irrespective of if the distrust being expressed is completely justified or not - they wouldn't feel the need. Either way, more options IMO is good.

Or... how about those being potential options AND allowing people to have granular control over how a program behaves with the rest of the system?

Irrespective of anything else, I definitely wanna install Torotise + RVC now to experiment with - hopefully my stupid ass can figure it out.

The "as closed as possible" bit, ngl, always bothered me (since I believe tech like this should be open, moreso knowing the foundation here is essentially built on OSS). I wonder, perhaps a stupid question, does this mean that if someone really, REALLY wanted to, they could (with relative ease) start up their own 15ai type deal, with most of the same things that made it attractive in the first place?

My favorite for cartoon character voices was 15ai (still down over a year and (and a half?) later), since you could do text to speech in the voice of many cartoon characters with different tones/inflections for different emotions. *le sad sigh*

Given the breadth of "AI" and related technologies themselves, as well as the wide breadth of potential and upcoming applications for this stuff, this sounds like ... well, it sounds kind of inane to say "it's all garbage, will always be garbage, ban it" since it ignore those applications (such as in medical research for instance).

Calling others a clown whilst making a very disingenuous comparison (coupled with presumptions) is quite ironic.

How in fuck is an airspeed or altitude "proprietary" like a recipe or industrial process?

Part of me wishes that they'd tap into the EU, the lore and stories from books, games, etc, as there is SO MUCH THERE that takes place before during and after the events of Episodes 4 and 6 that can be tapped into to tell stories, and even IMO enrich the world that we already have.

I'd think it pretty cool if they did this not as a substitute per-se of anything new-new, but as a massive supplement.