Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Why is this legal?? + profit margins are 60%! (Score 2) 35

I worked for telecom firms for several decades and saw the FCC routinely granting authorization for the many myriad fees that the Big 3 and everyone else added to the bill. Telco Recovery Charge used to be called Bill Service Fee and was pitched to FCC as necessary to pay for maintenance of the automation infrastructure, e.g. the computers and data centers. The name was changed because customers grew upset knowing they were being charged to print a bill for mailing, and then were still being charged when they went paperless.

Comment Re: No loss (Score 1) 48

keep finding these pointless things dumped on the lawns of an apartment building I superintend in Los Angeles, and our building is several city blocks from any business or retail location. I'm tired of trying to move them into a place where someone might use it, but I can't throw them into the rubbish bin either

Comment Re:oh really? (Score 1) 127

It's maddening to watch Blue Origin stuck in the mire of not achieving orbit, but instead lobbying to redefine astronaut credentials to feel good about less than 90secs of near 0g flight. Especially since Bezos beat Musk to the punch over two decades ago to hire the few McDonnell Douglas engineers who had successfully built the DC-X Delta Clipper in the mid '90s on a literal shoestring budget; I was sure that B-O would have leapfrogged SpaceX with that foundation of engineering knowledge but it's been squandered. What they've become is pretty much a copy of Lockheed.

Comment Re:Facts buried 2 links deep (Score 1) 106

regarding your 3rd bullet: even if a grease trap holds 2000 gallons, nobody allows an operational grease trap to totally fill up before draining. additionally, presuming a full 2000 gallon grease trap is possible, it takes more than 3x grease traps volume to produce 6000 gallons of aviation fuel due to the refining - you can't just pour pork & chicken fat into a turbofan engine (cf your 2nd bullet item)

Comment Re:This 80's movie (Score 1) 76

I remember that movie and indeed it foreshadowed debates that should have been happening all along. It was at a SIGGRAPH conference in the late 1980s where I attended a workshop that discussed the concept of synthetic actors, pretty much the premise of Looker, at the time when we who worked in computer graphics were seeing an explosion in functionality, raising the state of the art from wireframe to solid modeling and photo realistic ray tracing. The session had a brief discussion of the possibilities of digitizing the image and voice of a person to be used for automated productions, and there were a few working actors in the audience who vigorously protested that notion saying it would endanger their livelihoods if producers and directors could dispense with humans in favor of digital synthetic actors.

The fact is that digital production in that era was not up to speed to achieve that yet, it still required literal months of processing time to create even short films like the ones Pixar was doing back then. Toy Story was a cinematic breakthrough in 1995 but still looked like a cartoon, so the debate had cooled off and no one was pursuing a solution to the synthetic actor issue.

Finally, after more than 3 decades the issue came to the fore as current computer technology is indeed fast enough to displace human actors with synthetic ones. I hope the actors got some strong guard rails put around synthetic actors.

Comment Re:Better go see it soon (Score 1) 91

a prominent entertainment reporter on LA television news went to the opening show (U2 concert) and made some interesting comments about the Sphere, he said it was an amazing visual and aural experience, the technology definitely works in a fantastic way, yet he noted that any entertainer who wants to book the Sphere needs to have an extremely creative mind to conceive and plan a show that will utilize the enveloping video and audio so that the audience is enraptured by the product. He couldn't think of many entertainers at the moment who could fully take advantage of the technology provided at the Sphere; this is troubling for business going forward.

Comment Re:Cool! (Score 1) 74

There was another company, Aeroscraft, which was building a similar dirigible in the Navy airship hangars in Tustin CA over a decade ago, for the same ostensible mission of delivering cargo to areas without airstrips. Sadly, the hangar building roof broke during a storm in 2013 and the airship was heavily damaged by falling debris. Since that time, the firm seems to have backed off giant airships and has been selling aerostats to the military.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Only the hypocrite is really rotten to the core." -- Hannah Arendt.

Working...