So what do those log look like?

Like "Mon Jan 14 14:39:37 CET 2019: A station associated!"?

Last time I checked, the device has to talk to the AP in order to authenticate.

No.

At least Ford terminates all CAN busses right on the DLC instead of having a stupid ass gateway in front of it.

Joke's on them -- I bought this years visa gift cards with last years visa gift cards.

FTFY

You, Sir, seem to have an excellent understanding of networking. Hats off to you.

</sarc>

Found the non programmer.

These are root CA certs. Their very specific permission is to be able to sign other certs, including intermediate CA certs, by the way.

Not saying the system is the bee's knees, but clearly you don't know the first thing about it.

Jaywalking in Germany is only illegal if you do it in reasonable proximity (don't know if there's an exact number) of a pedestrian crossing.

Then again, many Germans will not cross a red light even when the roads are completely empty and it's like 3am. Always makes me chuckle and cringe at the same time.

With 50000 entries in your hosts file (why do people keep capitalizing it BTW?) your stub resolver must perform like shit. You're essentially slowing down everything that requires DNS, which these days is practically anything.

You may want to consider dropping the fugly hack that is hosts file based "blocking" and go for a more sensible approach. Just food for thought.

Whoosh

Sounds like a legit approach?

You seem to have gone on autopilot there. I haven't said it's against any way of doing anything. I merely find the idea of porting that amusing (have you even considered how portable sysinternals is going to be given what it does?) and pointless.

Wow

I don't see what the reply has to do with the quoted part, or with the whole comment for that matter.

What's fanboyish about pointing out that there's no need to port over the highly Windows-specific ersatz-instrumentation when the target OS already has it?