Comment Proprietary vaccine dev model = greedy garbage (Score 0) 411
We need to insist on the application of public domain and GPL style vaccine development, not the proprietary intellectual property model of patented & limited access vaccine technology. Jonas Salk put his vaccine in the public domain because he was against the proprietary model and we should recognize this as a predecessor to the free software movement. If people really believe the proprietary vaccine model is superior they should have to prove it.
Is it really plausible that the same big pharma industry that happily hikes the price of insulin multiple times per year is at all committed to maximizing vaccine quality -- especially since they can get mandatory purchase policies on their products?? If you had a product people were already forced to buy in batches regularly, would you really bother to try your best to improve it to the max?
That to me seems completely ridiculous. As tech improves it is easier to create extremely fine grained contaminant detectors. If the vaccine industry were not simply a mandatory / proprietary pharma model, there would be public listings giving in depth data about contaminants detected amid tens of thousands of tested vaccine vials, and you could simply have the pick of whichever variety of openly developed and patent-unencumbered vaccine you would like to choose. Unless this kind of model is adopted the quality will never significantly improve. It's an incredible amount of vendor lock in and a totally unworthy system for a serious public health issue and generally useful set of technologies. (and smash all science journal paywalls, demand open science and an end to all patents of critical technologies)