There are others whose opinions are far more principal to that question than yours.

Those who ignore history are bound to make really big fools of themselves on Slashdot.

Go away, troll.

Evi has been my closest contact at CU over the years. She was always a good friend and administered the scholarship I set up there. I am very sad but hoping to hear good news from my NZ friends. Evi was a very important person when it comes to Unix and Internet routing.

"Anybody who gives control of their "business" to a third party is probably foolish."
that's all business name one that doesn't depend on some 3rd party.

"Do you see where I am coming from here...?"
That you are obtuse?

Since google is aware it can't be perfect, and has a history of adjusting filters to try and narrow it in, i'm not worried about it.

Clearly you lack the ability to think about things and prefer to jump to meaningless hyperbole and non relevant examples.
It's sad really.

No ,it isn't over broad. It' vague becasue you can't really define all the situations. The world is full of rules like that.

One involves sex, one involves killing people. yeah, I can see how you would mix that up.

I wasn't saying that all of the Red Hat Enterprise Linux users would install it immediately in their mission critical systems on Wall Street, either.

But we can give you a significant number of users of a real kernel for your experiment.

The OS is mostly replaced about every 5-10 years.

That's why we have Linux. You can get a real OS implementation in users hands immediately. You only need these poor half measures for the Microsoft version.

IT's not racist by any reasonable stretch of the imagination. Stop forcing things to fit into you narrow, preconceived, notions.

Speak for yourself.

You only draw a line to make yourself feel superior.

Star Trek has almost no science, it has 'magic' devices they use to move the ship and create plot devices.

A great quick start is to just kill a random 70% of all people. Now you have gotten rid of the most unlucky ones.

It's bullshit becasue of the power requirements, which thanks to Einstein, we can figure out.

I have no objection to protocol experiments that are 100% Open Source implementations. I wouldn't trust one that was not, and an Open Standard is just instructions for people who make implementations.

But it seems that a lot of this might belong in a system facility rather than the browser and server. I don't know if it makes sense to put all of TLS in the kernel, but at least it could go in its own process. Using UDP is fine for an experiment, but having 200 different ad-hoc network stacks each tied into their own application and all of them using UDP is not.