Here's the funny thing about traffic enforcement cameras in the US.
I'm not sure this is 100% true in all states, I wouldn't be surprised if it is because it should be, but I at least know this is true in many states. One state in particular, had to change their laws because law enforcement kept perjuring themselves over it.
In the US, constitutionally, a criminal offense has to be proven to be you doing it. All cameras prove is that someone driving your car did it. Camera resolutions are nowhere near 100% in identifying drivers, and moreover, what if you had a twin? That is not sufficient for a criminal offense, aka "moving violation" for traffic laws. Financial responsibility of the vehicle does not equate to committing the violation. So you don't go to traffic court for camera violations, your insurance doesn't increase. Moreover, in some states, like mine, a moving violation citation needs to be issued by a uniformed law enforcement officer *at the time of violation*. They can't just mail it to you like they do with camera violations.
So, camera tickets are *civil* penalties. They're like parking tickets. If you don't pay them, the state can send it to collections, ding your credit, forbid you from other related government services like drivers license renewal and car registration renewal until you pay, but they cannot throw you in jail.
In my jurisdiction, there is a small rectangle at the bottom of a back page where I can affirm that I was not in control of the vehicle. There's also a line where I "MAY" identify who was driving. I don't have to give up that info under the 5th Amendment. I just sign that declaration and The End. The ticket goes away.