Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! ×

Comment Mortality rates for car fuel sources (Score 1) 119

Here's a study discussing mortality rate effects of the various forms of vehicle power: http://www.pnas.org/content/11...

Two highlights: Battery production does cause some mortalities, but charge the battery from a natural gas power plant and your total mortality rate is less than half the mortality rate of a gasoline vehicle. Charge with Wind, Water, or Solar, and you cut the mortality rate 80%. Charging from a coal plant would be a poor choice, however.

Comment Re:Democrats helping the wealthy, again (Score 1) 119

A reduction in air pollution means a reduction in pollution related health problems, which means a reduction in health care costs for 80-90% of the population, and an increased quality of life for those suffering from the health problems. We lose $120 to $280 billion a year on health care and loss of life due to fossil fuel-caused air pollution. That's $500 per year for every man, woman, and child. Reducing air pollution also means a reduction in future weather related property damage, which again is something a majority of the country pays for, through property insurance.

Comment Re:Really? To lower pollution? (Score 1) 119

In addition to the other responses: you get to use your lithium battery thousands of times. You only get one use from a gallon of gas.
 
Also, many people have the option of getting electricity from a green supplier or purchasing their own solar panels to charge the battery.

Here's a study discussing mortality rate effects of the various forms of vehicle power: http://www.pnas.org/content/11...

Two highlights: Battery production does cause some mortalities, but charge the battery from a natural gas power plant and your total mortality rate is less than half the mortality rate of a gasoline vehicle. Charge with Wind, Water, or Solar, and you cut the mortality rate 80%. Charging from a coal plant would be a poor choice, however.

Comment Re:How many lives are saved by air pollution (Score 1) 123

We certainly aren't going to take away clean water, etc from people just to cut down on pollution, but we can reduce the amount of pollution generated by those services. We have good ways of making clean electricity for clean water and hospital power. I don't think we're ready for electric ambulances or shipping yet. And we definitely won't have electric LifeFlight helicopters soon.

Comment Or is life more stressful? (Score 1) 432

Is there any study showing that life today is more -- or less -- stressful than life decades ago? These days, it seems like both parents need to work in order to have enough money to raise kids. Further, the kids need to do more extracurricular activity to get into a good college, which means the parents spend more time driving around.

To be clear, that is just my observation. I have not done an objective study to measure stress. I just don't think we should blame the medical industry until we've ruled out the other possible cause(s) for more people with mental health issues.

Slashdot Top Deals

Nonsense. Space is blue and birds fly through it. -- Heisenberg

Working...