Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:"Open" how? (Score 1) 132

Fuck developers.

Ah, yes. "Fuck" the people that made your ecosystem the success it is.

Do you think that iPhones would be as successful as they are if it wasn't for the huge amount of apps on the app store? Without third-party apps it would be a very limited experience.

Comment Re:Is it about (Score 1) 65

But what about when the overwhelming majority of the Affected Consumers, i.e., Apple Users, would actually prefer that things stay just the way they are?

Then they just do nothing and everything will stay as it is for them.
But other users, that want more choice, will have it.

Nobody is forcing third-party stores or alternative payment providers on users. They can alway refuse to change.

Comment Re:PDOs (Score 1) 314

That "Socialist country" is almost certainly Germany, as this is exactly as these things are handled here.

SHOULD an insurance company run out of money their bills will be paid with the money that all health insurance providers collectively had to put aside fore exactly that case. A similar system is used to ensure that if a bank runs out of money the people will still be able to access all or a significant amount of the money they entrusted that bank with. I'm pretty sure that a similar system is in effect for banks in the US as well. I don't know if the health insurance providers are backed-up similarly in the US.

And yes, the insurance providers do sometimes increase their rates. But not because they run out of money due to having to pay for too many sick days. They know that this is the law and they calculate accordingly.

These laws ensure that if you get sick, you can concentrate on getting better rather than having to worry about how to pay your bills.

I know this is a strange concept for some people, but laws sometimes can be written to benefit the people, rather than companies.

Comment Re:It "has" to be removed? (Score 0) 120

You didn't pay for Wordpad.
You (maybe) pied for Windows, and you know that a certain number of system apps come bundled with it. but the exact apps change all the time, and I don't remember seeing Microsoft advertising Wordpad as a part of Windows in... ever?

So you're not losing anything that was promised to you, but just something that you got used to having.

Comment Re:What's the story here? (Score 2) 105

So... when the GNU people forked Libreboot under the same name it was ok, but when others to it to them it's not?

Also, the "you have to defend your trademark or you loose it" stuff is not true (or at least not as simple as these statements make it sound).

Comment Re:Why would it take an EU ruling (Score 5, Insightful) 283

Maybe, instead of just parroting the talking points of the manufactures, you should check the facts.

Why is it that especially rugged phones, that are made to be durable and water-resistant, often do allow to easily replace the battery?
And there are non-rugged phones as well that combine replaceable batteries with being water-resistant.

The real reason why manufactures don't want replaceable batteries is that they can more easily sell you a new phone if replacing a dead battery is complicated and expensive.

Comment Re:Can't allow the state to make the rules (Score 1, Insightful) 75

What *IS* the incentive for internet companies to provide their services, if not monetary?

That is the wrong question, based on a flawed assumption.
The EU isn't stopping these big companies from running ads. It's stopping them from running targeted ads without fully informing the customers.

So the answer to what incentive these companies have to provide their services is "less money than now, more money than nothing". Will these companies be happy about making less money? No. Will they instead opt to not make any money at all? Hello no.

Slashdot Top Deals

All power corrupts, but we need electricity.

Working...