SGI Hiring 5+ Linux Kernel Hackers 54
cybrthng writes "Well, according to some adds on linuxtoday and also via SGI's SGI Employment Opportunities Webpage You can search under technical/engineering jobs and sure enough they're looking for a few good men to develop linux for SGI :) "
Nice to see them start to make a bigger play in the Linux
arena. I'm hearing cool rumors from over there- let's hope
they're better then the name change...
This is true, you have to read this. (Score:1)
Well my friends, sorry to hold this information out on you guys for so long, but i would of rather had the "I told you so" attitude rather than the "Opps im sorry for getting your hopes up".
radioflyr
PTC Should Maybe Check These Out (Score:1)
Linux vs. Ms-WinNT in Integrated System Design magazine quite some time ago.
The editorial that started it all and the articles that followed are listed
below mostly in chronological order.
Editorial - April 1998 [isdmag.com]
Cover Story - July 1998 [isdmag.com]
Cover Story - August 1998 [isdmag.com]
Editorial - August 1998 [isdmag.com]
Linux vs. NT Public Forum [isdmag.com]
And this one in Electronic Engineering Times:
'Real' designers reject Windows NT [eet.com]
It seems that, overall, at least hardware engineers with a job to get done
prefer *nix over NT by far.
Re:Linux on what architecture? (Score:1)
Re:sgi & ptc (Score:1)
Hmmm, if pro/e is going to be ported to linux then I'll have to convince SDRC for porting I-DEAS to linux. My new visual is waiting down the hall to replace my good old indy. I can't wait to start on the Visual but I am afraid NT will never be as good as IRIX, which hasn't crashed on me ever.
Dirk
sgi & ptc (Score:1)
This could be the breakthrough on the desktop linux has been looking for. Stability of unix, applications of linux (yes, linux has more office apps than irix, and softwindows is horrid)
I currently use an octane and pro/e daily. If sgi would have went with standard memory instead of some goofball type, it would have looked very good for those visual workstations.
Linux, Sgi, and Pro/e that would be nice.
dave
This might not be what you think (Score:1)
SGI (if they aren't crazy) isn't interested in spending another six years turning Linux into the operating system they already have; instead they want to use Linux's desktop strength to shore up a weak area for their OS.
Unless they make it all modules... (Score:1)
--
Kyle R. Rose, MIT LCS
I don't get it (Score:1)
Why learn a standard that is pushed by one company versus a standard that's been in use for a long time and is something that will stay around for a while? I.E. C/C++ versus VB.
Greed? All the money made by VB developers? Don't C/C++ coders make more? Oh yeah, I forgot. VB is supposed to be the easy way to make a buck in programming. Everyone is looking for the easy way out. I suppose if you're only interested in coding a quick and dirty Windows app, you'll use VB. But I don't think that's what programming is about.
Maybe it's just me. I care more about enjoying my job and making something that I can be proud of, than about the money. And I cringe every time I'm forced to think about VB.
Then again, I've coded in VB just because I'm going to school now and I will take any job I can get that can deal with my schedule.
Ben
If they're rolling it into the kernel it will.. (Score:1)
I think someone mentioned that the job description mentioned putting this into the Open Source community.
Besides, if it's getting rolled into the kernel, it has to be free for use by others, doesn't it?
Re:sgi & ptc (Score:1)
Yes, Buffered ECC SDRAM is not what goes in most no-name PCs (std PC100 SDRAM is unbuffered), but it is what all DELL workstation-class machines, all IBM intellistations, etc. use.
Re:3Dfx fx? (Score:2)
3dfx is a monopolistic company that will NOT Emprace open source. They wanted some developers for closed source drivers.
SGI is looking for people to make the opensource support for their system better. They are also donating a TON of their own technology to the Kernel and X projects including GL and its companian technology, SMP work, etc.
In short OpenSource people LIKE what SGI is trying to do. People don't like companies who release Binary only drivers like 3dfx.
On a personaly note OpenSource is why I run linux not Solaris 7 (now that it's free for non-comercial use) or *BSD.
SGI serious about Linux (Score:2)
people every week or so for the last several
months, and I am impressed that they are moving
strongly in the right direction. They've made
a considerable amount of progress on a volunteer
basis; to get their new VW (Intel) box running
Linux. Last I heard from them is that they were
going to hire a couple of engineers full time.
The way that I see it, is that SGI has a fairly
simple decision to make; are they interested in
all of their previous customers (like me) or not?
Current (and former) SGI users would prefer Linux
to NT; but it is true that the SGI userbase is
sadly small. Still, the growth of Linux, at
the apparent expense of NT, seems to have shown
management at SGI the light.
This announcement that they want to hire 5 people
is further news that they are even more aggressive
than I had thought. Great.
This, along with the funding of Precision Insight
to write a direct rendering infrastructure for
Linux, shows that SGI gets it. Note, too, that
Precision Insight has just hired Daryll Strauss
of Digital Domain (who did, in his spare time,
the full-screen OpenGL for Voodoo cards under
Linux) to further their work. They're looking
for more people, too...check out
http://www.precisioninsight.com
3Dfx fx? (Score:1)
Oh please (Score:1)
You dont slam armstrong for saying "a giant leap for MANkind" do you?
But then again, I cant really say that I know what its like to be a woman in this industry. It might be like one of those thins you smile smugly about the first time but really gets on your nerves the twentieth time.
Re:Hmm.. (Score:1)
---
Re:3Dfx fx? (Score:2)
---
Welcome to the next level (Score:1)
This ranks second in coolness only to the development of a REAL libGL.so for Linux }:-)
Re:Hmm.. (Score:2)
code that you're used to in VB; I
think they need serious
kernel hackers to address sgi-specific hardware
stuff and OpenGL integration (hopefully).
I doubt they'd go for Linux on MIPS; why throw
away all that IRIX devel? I'm sure this is
for their VPC line. Probably want to get some
driver support into the Linux kernel for the
sgi cobalt video chipset and take advantage of
the UMA.
there are 7 Linux jobs posted (Score:1)
req # | date posted| title
------+------------+---------------------------
35470 | 03/19/1999 | Linux Kernel Development Eng
35726 | 03/05/1999 | Linux Kernel Dev Engineer
35727 | 03/05/1999 | Linux Kernel Dev Engineer
35730 | 03/05/1999 | Linux Kernel Dev Engineer
35731 | 03/05/1999 | Linux Kernel Dev Engineer
35742 | 03/05/1999 | Systems Eng-Linux OS Dev
36186 | 04/30/1999 | Dekstop [sic] Linux Product Manager
------+------------+---------------------------
Here's an excerpt of the Responsibilities section of the marketing job (36186):
you do the math!Re:"a few good MEN"? (Score:1)
Beth
Re:Hmm.. (Score:1)
Works just fine. Performance absolutely great (we get full duplex 95Mb/s (in each direction) on the Ethernet while playing back an MPEG movie from harddisk on a K5-133)
The point is that the Linux kernel is not C++.
I think it used to be compiled with the gpp compiler for a while but due to bugs in the compiler they switched back to gcc.
Breace.
"a few good MEN"? (Score:3)
It's true that there may not be many female kernel hackers to go around, but it's insidious inadvertant slips like this that contribute to the situation, and that's bad for all of us.
Re:SGI serious about Linux (Score:1)
Re:SGI serious about Linux (Score:1)
Linux Employment (Score:1)
Linux on what architecture? (Score:1)
SGI Releasing XFS open-source ? (Score:2)
XFS is the journaling filesystem used by IRIX. IRIX with XFS has some unique features like "guaranteed rate I/O". I wonder if they'll port this to Linux.
If you don't know what XFS is good for, recovering an 18 Gb XFS filesystem after power failure takes a few seconds ! No more waiting for fsck... Less downtime...