NSI sells registrant info. Again. 108
Well, it appears that a number of you noticied NSI's latest escapade. Yes, this time our friends have decided to create company profiles of all registrants - including
addresses, ownership, number of employees, years in business, annual sales, and phone and facsimile numbers. Mmm...I thought spam was bad enough. Who the heck is the . in .com? Um-a bunch of you needed to be told this was a joke (the last sentence). Sarcasm, folks.
Legal in US, not in EU (Score:1)
Under the new EU Privacy Directive, on the other hand, this is strictly illegal.
(I spent a semester researching on-line privacy issues in a class)
- pmitros
Sample Report: NSOL (Score:2)
Perhaps this is what you should expect a sample report to look like. All the information below is available at no charge, from public sources, over the Internet.
NETWORK SOLUTIONS INC.
Registered URL: http://www.netsol.com [netsol.com]
Stock Ticker: NSOL
Address:
505 Huntmar Park Drive
Herndon, VA 20170
EXECUTIVES AND DIRECTORS:
Michael A. Daniels
Position: Chairman of the Board, Acting Chief Executive Officer
Age: 53
Class A Shares as of 3/12/1999: 29,560
Robert J. Korzeniewski
Position: Chief Financial Officer, Acting Chief Operating Officer
Age: 42
Class A Shares as of 3/12/1999: 25,842
1998 Sal: $165,462, Bon: $90,000, plus other compensation including options
Bruce L. Chovnick
Position: Senior Vice President and General Manager, Internet Technology Services
Age: 39
Class A Shares as of 3/12/1999: 4,294
1998 Sal: $181,730, Bon: $65,000, plus other compensation including options
Resides: 19209 Autumn Maple Ln, Gaithersburg, MD 20879, MONTGOMERY CO
Residential Phone: 301-977-3776
Jonathan W. Emery
Position: Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Age: 47
David H. Holtzman
Position: Senior Vice President, Engineering
Age: 42
Class A Shares: 13,704
1998 Sal: $157,615, Bon: $70,000, plus other compensation including options
Resides: 904 Monroe St, Herndon, VA 20170, FAIRFAX CO
1/1/1999 Assessed Value: $270,660
Most Recent Sale Date: 6/11/1998 @ $313,500
Residential Phone: 703-481-9050
Donald N. Telage
Position: Senior Vice President, Internet Relations and Special Projects
Age: 54
Class A Shares: 39,488
1998 Sal: $188,999, Bon: $85,000, plus other compensation including options
Resides: 2110 Highcourt Ln UNIT 203, Herndon, VA 20170, FAIRFAX CO
Co-owned with TELAGE SUSAN M
1/1/1999 Assessed Value: $103,600
Most Recent Sale Date: 3/28/1995 @ $116,400
Residential Phone: 703-787-9438
Douglas L. Wolford
Position: Senior Vice President, Marketing and Sales
Age: 37
Charles A. Gomes
Position: Vice President, Customer Programs
Age: 52
Resides: 17307 Bighorn Ct, Round Hill, VA 20141, LOUDOUN CO
Residential Phone: 540-338-9292
Michael G. Voslow
Position: Vice President, Finance and Treasurer
Age: 39
Resides: 1310 Alps Dr, Mc Lean, VA 22102, FAIRFAX CO
Co-owned with VOSLOW REBECCA A R
1/1/1999 Assessed Value: $398,765
Most Recent Sale Date: 12/3/1991 @ $431,000
Residential Phone: 703-442-7891
Karla Leavelle
Position: Director, Human Resources
Resides: 4610 Gramlee Cir, Fairfax, VA 22032, FAIRFAX CO
Co-owned with GRIENDLING ROBERT J
1/1/1999 Assessed Value: $256,250
Most Recent Sale Date: 6/30/1995 @ $245,000
Residential Phone: 703-978-4468
My fault. (Score:1)
Prediction. (Score:1)
If half of the people commenting on this story aren't talking through their hats, you're going to be "growing" like Scientology, soon. Sure, the hordes dropping y'all like a slimy potato may end up being just as annoyed with the competition as they are with you, but that won't help much when the layoffs come.
Time to stroll Washington (Score:1)
NIN (Score:1)
i am the dot in your dot com... (and i control you)
i am the slash in your slash dot... (and i control you)
i am the core in your home directory... (and i control you)
no, thats not right...
;)
Re: Okay, enough reading... (Score:1)
On the other hand, I do submit postal information with companies and organizations I do wish to send me commercial postal mail, catalogs, flyers, etc. I have even at one time or another offered my email address to a company which stated that they would occasionally send me advertising in exchange for a service. I just procmail their advertising into a folder other than my inbox. Yes I do look at it--not closely usually, but I do look.
My time has a price. If you force me to spend my time reading spam, I will take the extra time do do whatever I can to help make your life hell. If you want to offer me a useful service in exchange for commercial email which I can sort someplace other than my primary inbox and look at it when I want, I'll actually look at it.
As for postal junkmail, I can very easily process that at my convenience anyway.
internic alternatives (Score:1)
Doesn't suprise me. (Score:1)
Thank you for pointing that out! (Score:1)
over-reacting.
NSI is the operating system for the internet? Huh? (Score:1)
That doesn't even make sense. The whole point of the Internet is the lack of central control, which is why NSI is obsolete, and getting stupider every day.
If NSI is the operating system, could we please format them, and reinstall sooner? I hate it when an operating system does stupid things behind my back without telling me.
Other Methods -- LDAP it is! (Score:1)
No, more like:
http://some.domain.with.new.top:ldap/index.html
The front part of a URL describes the protocol over the connection, not how to find it.
LONG LIVE CAPITALISM! (Score:1)
"Greed is good" (Score:1)
J.
ownership of domain and whois databases (Score:1)
Any Brits want to comment on this and perhaps point this out to NSI?
Nick
Aieeeeeeee!!!!!! (Score:1)
Sample Report: NSOL (Score:1)
computers://use.urls. People use Networds.
Second part of the link (Score:1)
monopoly violations (Score:1)
It's one thing for people to be able to contact the owner of a particular IP/URL, but it's quite another for them to do massive, indeed internet-universal, privacy violation.
And selling to spammers...that adds insult to injury.
I know, I'm preaching to the choir, but still, this really bugs me.
Forget .com (Score:1)
It's not like they won't be selling
I am the colon in http:// (Score:1)
No, the other one. Yeah, that's me.
two separate issues, privacy and ownership (Score:2)
With regard to privacy, it has never been the case that domain registration information was private. It makes some sense for this data to be a matter of public record; the purpose of collecting the data is to provide a means of contacting the people responsible for a domain. Since DNS is a public resource, and no one is forced to register a domain, there is some justification for the data being publicly available in order to facilitate the proper management of the public resource. I realize that there are also strong arguments to be made in favor of privacy. However, this is not my major concern. It is easy enough to register a domain with a mail drop and a voice mailbox as the contact information. Or some people provide entirely false information. I don't think that is a good idea, but it can be done. Personally I am not in favor of supporting anonymous domain registration, any more than I would be in favor of anonymous automobile registration.
What I am concerned about is the concept that NSI claims to own the data. It might perhaps seem counterintuitive, but I am claiming that I don't mind NSI giving away my data, yet I object to their selling it. And it's not really even the selling per se that is the problem. It's that since they claim to own it, they aren't really selling it. They are licensing it, and claim that no one else has the right to distribute it.
Effectively they have stolen my data, by licensing it to third parties under different terms than I've previously granted them permission. If they want to actually own my data, to the extent that they can license it as they please, then they had damn well better buy it from me first.
In addition, they appear to be combining the data with other data they obtain from third parties. Yet I am given no opportunity to review this additional data and correct any errors. Others have pointed out that much of the information NSI is selling can be obtained from D&B or other sources. However, when you obtain that information from D&B, it doesn't come pre-packaged with domain name registration information, and that is the crucial difference. NSI may have the right to resell information they have legitimately purchased from another source such as D&B, but they do not have the right to comingle it with my domain registration information, since they don't own the latter.
I feel doubly screwed by this, since I've paid them for this great privilege. What a great business to be in: one group of people pays them $70 each to collect the data, and another group buys the resulting database!
ownership of domain and whois databases (Score:3)
Now they claim that they own the data, and that the database is proprietary such that they can do with it as they will. I think this is a load of crap, and am tempted to have a lawyer draft a cease and desist order demanding that NSI refrain from claiming that the data I've provided to them regarding my domain is proprietary to them, selling that data to a third party, or using the data in any other way not explicity authorized by their contract with the NSF.
internic alternatives (Score:1)
---
"'Is not a quine' is not a quine" is a quine.
Bill Gates Takes Credit for.. (Score:1)
They must take after windows, not linux (Score:1)
I've heard a lot of pompous BS masquerading as mission statements in my time, but this one takes the cake. This is even less connected to reality than the usual PR snowjob companies release to the press.
It's too bad we can't give people like this a reality injection and watch them squirm as they realize their own ignorance.
I, for one, intend to wait until I can by my domain from someone OTHER than NSI. I've waited this long, after all
stupid tags, bad HTML everywhere ... WTF? (Score:1)
Oh, I almost forgot. NSI sucks. What arrogance.
I'm dot orgying the world (Score:1)
NIS also violates top-level domain structure! (Score:1)
-
-
-
um (Score:1)
interesting how netsol had two choices in the face of competition (offer better service, or abuse monopoly for the rest of its duration) and chose the one least likely to retain customers after the end of its monopoly. isn't that a good basis for a shareholder class action lawsuit, never mind the others that have been mentioned?
i'll be glad when i have a choice.
Boycott NSI (Score:1)
Time to stroll Washington (Score:1)
monopoly violations (Score:1)
NSI did _not_ get this information from companies during the registration process. They got it from the same place that any of the other yellow page services get it.
2) NSI has never sold the database to spammers. Until recently it was very easy to suck our database based on retrieving the zone file and diffing it.
Aieeeeeeee!!!!!! (Score:1)
Okay, enough reading... (Score:1)
You can purchase the same information for pennies per company. Its compiled from the yellow pages, SEC filings, and by even calling the companies directly.
Re: Okay, enough reading... (Score:1)
I.e. NSI is simply repackaging data that already appears in services all over the net and they don't give you an opt out method either.
This isn't from the registration database... (Score:3)
NSI is _not_ selling the data to infoUSA and its not getting the data from registrants. Its using already public information the same way that 411 and the other yellow pages services do.
The service is no different from the services that infoUSA already sells their info to: Yahoo, MSN, AOL, etc.
Use IP addresses instead (Score:1)
Probably about the same time we see the US finally adopt the metric system.
Both are pretty much the same line of BS from the US we've been hearing for years.
IPv6 (aka IPng - IP The Next Generation):
Conceptualized back when Star Trek-The Next Generation was still on. Now here, where Star Trek:Deep Space Nine is done in a couple weeks, it STILL ain't in place. (And we all home they cancel that pathetic ST:Voyager series. Send us all a nude picture of 7of9 and send the rest back to whereever they came from)
Realize smoke up your ass when you see/hear/feel it...
Sun vs NSI (Score:2)
BR?
Sun is "the . in
Doesn't suprise me. (Score:1)
Thank god domains will soon cost $5, and NSI will be broke due to competition.
--
Yes it is. (Score:1)
"InfoUSA, whose best known subsidiaries are DatabaseAmerica and American Business Information, also will add NSI's ".com" directory to its Web site."
Please explain to me how InfoUSA can add NSI's ".com" directory to their database if NSI is not selling it to them?
Personal information like that is property, if NSI is generating reveneue from my personal information, I want a cut, so I have just politely informed them that the fee to include my information in any such database is a mere $500. I think I may be going too easy on them...
...but not as bad as the .MLM crowd (Score:1)
The following sentence is true.
The previous sentence is false.
um? (Score:1)
----------------------
Second part of the link (doh!) (Score:1)
"Error Type 3. User IQ (-4) out of range (0..200). Please reboot."
----------------------
Whatever Happened to Kashpureff? (Score:1)
Okay, enough reading... (Score:1)
I paid for a service. I had no choice in vendors, because NSI was given a governmentally approved monopoly. I can live with this; it was a necessary evil.
Now, however, according to the article at http://www.news.com/News/ Item/0,4,0-35228,00.html?st.ne.fd.mdh [news.com] you plan on selling this data that I provided to you with the expectation of privacy. I hereby serve notice that if you sell my information to anyone at anytime, I will file suit immediately.
Or... (Score:1)
~enucite~
SHUT UP!!!! ---and question about filtering (Score:1)
For the love of God! Just post _ONE_ toplevel comment, and quit filling up my screen with this crap.
--Question--
Does anyone know if there is an option to filter USER comments from the comments page?
If there isn't anything: ROB can you please put a section in the preferences page where we can enter the user names of people whose comments we want to filter out?
~enucite~
The Internet Will Die... (Score:1)
As for replacing BIND, what happens if you give named a root-servers file with different root servers in it?
For the past six months or so, I've been involved in a discussion between representatives of a number of major international corporations, mostly in the financial services sector, who are considering building a kind of a next-generation Internet, called the Grid, co-operatively owned and operated (similar to the UK's NIC [www.nic.uk]), based upon IPv6, with all of the advantages that entails.
From what I've heard in the meetings I've attended, they plan to build an intial backbone around the world, centred and controlled from London, linking to Dublin, Paris, Frankfurt, Berlin, Moscow, Hong Kong, Tokyo and a couple of cities in the United States. It would initially only be used by the companies involved in initially setting it up, but, later, anyone would be allowed to join and become equal shareholders in the non-profit company which will own and operate the backbone, as long as they pay their share of the cost of maintaining the backbone.
The technical details aren't really an issue at the moment. One of the committee invited me along after hearing me speak at a conference and I've been advising them as to what's possible and what's not. What you've outlined above is the sort of thought process I had to go through to figure out how the Grid's DNS system could interface with the exiting Internet's.
It's all quite interesting. Whether it'll actually pan out is another matter, but their reasons for wanting to do this (dissatisfaction with the current ownership and administration of the Internet and with it's security) aren't exactly unreasonable.
Funnily enough, the main things they end up discussing in their meetings are related to the administration of Grid - i.e. how the administrating company would be set up and owned, whether all the stakeholders should have an equal vote or not, how to ensure that no one company or organisation can gain too much power, etc. They're not all that worried about the technical side, because it's all pretty much possible - or will be when IPv6-capable networking equipment and operating systems become available.
It's a lot of fun sitting there and watching them all get into seriously deep legal discussions and so on...
The Dodger
Hacker & International Network Architect
The Internet Will Die... (Score:1)
..eventually.
As for replacing BIND, what happens if you give named a root-servers file with different root servers in it?
For the past six months or so, I've been involved in a discussion between representatives of a number of major international corporations, mostly in the financial services sector, who are considering building a kind of a next-generation Internet, called the Grid, co-operatively owned and operated (similar to the UK's NIC [www.nic.uk]), based upon IPv6, with all of the advantages that entails.
From what I've heard in the meetings I've attended, they plan to build an intial backbone around the world, centred and controlled from London, linking to Dublin, Paris, Frankfurt, Berlin, Moscow, Hong Kong, Tokyo and a couple of cities in the United States. It would initially only be used by the companies involved in initially setting it up, but, later, anyone would be allowed to join and become equal shareholders in the non-profit company which will own and operate the backbone, as long as they pay their share of the cost of maintaining the backbone.
The technical details aren't really an issue at the moment. One of the committee invited me along after hearing me speak at a conference and I've been advising them as to what's possible and what's not. What you've outlined above is the sort of thought process I had to go through to figure out how the Grid's DNS system could interface with the exiting Internet's.
It's all quite interesting. Whether it'll actually pan out is another matter, but their reasons for wanting to do this (dissatisfaction with the current ownership and administration of the Internet and with it's security) aren't exactly unreasonable.
Funnily enough, the main things they end up discussing in their meetings are related to the administration of Grid - i.e. how the administrating company would be set up and owned, whether all the stakeholders should have an equal vote or not, how to ensure that no one company or organisation can gain too much power, etc. They're not all that worried about the technical side, because it's all pretty much possible - or will be when IPv6-capable networking equipment and operating systems become available.
It's a lot of fun sitting there and watching them all get into seriously deep legal discussions and so on...
The Dodger
Hacker & International Network Architect
Time to stroll Washington (Score:1)
As for how they get it, I think they survey the companies involved. I think how it works is that this information is then used as a package meant to help judge the quality of company credit. Since most businesses need/want credit, it's not hard for them to get the information.
How accurate it is, of course, is anybody's guess. Getting data for public companies is pretty easy, but I think all they can do for private firms is ask.
D
First post on my new (well, used, well, ancient, well, 200mhz R4400) Indigo2. Nice to be back to SGI again. Irix(tm) is a weakness of mine..
----
Time for a class-action suit (Score:1)
--
I am the colon in http:// (Score:1)
Since when can a top-level-domain be "verbified"?
Re: Okay, enough reading... (Score:1)
AC
Re: Okay, enough reading... (Score:1)
I will deal with Yahoo, Dun & Bradsteet, and the others if I like. When I asked for AT&T to stop calling me they didn't reply by telling me that MCI calls too. So you know why?...because the Gov't stepped in when everyone got sick and tired of being interuptted at dinner time by "great offers for a new service".
Network Solutions should eye this whole situation very carefully because they will probably be the one that an example is made of to appease the unhappy netizens.
AC
Okay, enough reading... (Score:3)
Just another A.C.
NSI sold my info (Score:1)
Copyright yourself for fun and profit. (Score:1)
Why not?
It's obvious that your personal information (age, sex, race, shopping preferences) is worth a lot of money. Consider how many companies pay big bucks to other companies to get that information. Consider how desperate many companies are to get that information; so desperate, in fact, that they are willing to bribe you with t-shirts and tech support.
The current information service industry makes money by selling information collated from data they gather from various sources.
Why not gather every scrap of information about yourself into a searchable database (your brain, maybe?), and then charge companies for the use of that data?
Copyright yourself, or at least the data fingerprint you leave upon the world. If the software industry can make much ado about little 1s and 0s being copyrightable, surely your personality can be copyrightable. And wouldn't it make you feel a lot better to know that every time your name passed through a database in some obscure system, you made a few cents, and if the bad ole NSI sells that information about you without your consent, well... they could meet with Mr. Copyright Infringement suit. Or pay you royalties...
Hmm.. Banner ads for the soul?
Okay, enough reading... (Score:1)
-=Julian=-
I am the Borg in .org (Score:1)
(All this reminds me of NIN's "Mr. Self Destruct", heh)
I was not as nice as you all were.... (Score:1)
I have but one thing to say to you regarding this: it is utter and complete bullshit.
I really like the lack of an Opt Out policy that will be around a while. That is really sweet. What a wonderful way for you all to get a buttload of money for your database up front by making sure EVERYONE gets loads and loads of junk mail!
Ohhhh I can't wait for the day the other registration systems come online. You can bet your sweet ass that after this latest load of horse hockey that I will be taking my business elsewhere.
I will NEVER do business with a bunch of low life privacy invaders like you. You lost a customer for good.
Time for a class-action suit (Score:1)
Scrabling to remain relevant (Score:1)
Other Methods (Score:2)
Alternic was/is a good idea. In fact, I use (have been using) the db.root method for bind for a very long time now. But Alternic suffered from a lack of acceptance from the greater community, unfortunately. And they are a bit profit minded.
There is NO law that says I have to use the 'accepted' root servers for my name service. I can set my root servers to anything I damn well please. So then, this whole thing with NSI and et al is ridiculous, and strictly a matter of 'who does the government say runs the public database?'.
If 28 new registries pop up for new top level domains, it would take me 10 seconds to support each one of them. Why does that not happen? Well, BigCompany(tm) and its subsidiaries want to see central control instituted everywhere possible on everything in our lives, so that they can exploit those control points to leverage their profits. BigGovernment(tm) wants this too, so that they can 'Make Life Safer' for us by having it within their means to force direction and stifle radical change.
So, I would LOVE to see alternate registries and root servers, not under the purvue of any government agency or commitee, instituted. But That would take money. Gobs of it. And vision. And nobody whom HAS that money wants to spend it on this sort of thing. And noone whom has that vision seems to have that money. Also, noone has come up with a better way of maintaining all of this information, so it seems that the bind methodology will be with us for awhile. And so thus built into the DNS protocol is a central point of control.
Of course, it would be easy to use the existing bind implementation to ease that central control out from under us. There just needs to be a different strategy used for root server querying. Personally, I think that all of the top level domains should get their own root servers, if not multiple servers for each. The main root servers should only function as pointers to other TLD servers, thus eliminating the massive resource requirement. I believe
Under this scheme, any medium sized ISP could run a root server and have no problem keeping up with the load. It would NEVER get queried for name service unless you were running under the old system.
The issue then becomes, how the heck do the folks whom run TLD servers get compensated? I mean, there is no way I would run a TLD server unless I had funds coming in from somewhere. This is where the folks at BigCompany have exerted their control, and why we are left with the system we have now.
The current system has it that only registries would get money to support servers like this. Maybe that's the best way.. I don't know for certain. Something to think about.
Wow.. I'm getting long-winded..well, to sum up, I think the KEY here is to sluff off the TLD load from root servers to TLD servers. That way, root servers become less resource intensive, and the load gets distributed to all of the TLD servers, of which there could be many. Change the way we use bind a tiny bit, and we are off.
Yes, I KNOW that this would create additional traffic on an already loaded up internet.. but which do we want more.. a new method that decentralizes control a bit, or a few Kbps more of bandwidth at peak?
---
NIS also violates top-level domain structure! (Score:1)
If you check their web page, they now (do not know for how long they've been doing this) register your domain simultaneously under
LONG LIVE CAPITALISM! (Score:1)
so that they'll continue to do business with you
and you will continue to profit.
This is just plain old fucking GREED (I believe
that's older than capitalism).
-thomas
I am the second t in http (Score:1)
OHH MY! (Score:1)
If they lack respect for our privacy, why should we respect theirs? Heck, we *payed* them when we gave them our information, we had no choice, and nobody told us we were giving our private information away. If anyone deserves to lose their privacy between us and them, it's them.
Maybe we should group up and set a time to call if we don't get responses.
Just a thought, probably a crazy one though.
--SONET
Change your contact info.... (Score:1)
Change your contact info.... (Score:1)
I am the colon in http:// (Score:1)
strange... (Score:1)
Copyright yourself for fun and profit. (Score:1)
If you did it with things like fingerprints,
sex, and race your parents could sue the fuck
out of you.
I am the colon in http:// (Score:1)
Use IP addresses instead (Score:1)
I can just see the day when AT&T starts offering DNS for our phone lines... those numbers are too hard to remember ya know. Then we'll probably see a mass rush to register by domain name hoarders. Any thing to make a buck....
Copyright yourself for fun and profit. (Score:1)
Yikes.