New Radeon X1950 Pro Benchmarked 19
ThinSkin writes "ATI has today announced its mid-range Radeon X1950 Pro, which introduces a new CrossFire dual-card technology with fewer headaches. ExtremeTech has a full review of the X1950 Pro, including benchmarks against a GeForce 7900 GS in both single-card and dual-card configurations. According to the review, the single-card X1950 is a better performer versus the GeForce; however, in CrossFire mode, the X1950 doesn't quite have the punch to overtake the GeForce in SLI."
another review (Score:3, Informative)
The summary (Score:2)
It's actually a superb choice according to all web sites that have had this card benchmarked, but it also makes me wonde
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Seems not to be the case [theinquirer.net]
Re: (Score:2)
And another review (Score:2)
DX9 (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Any linux benchmarks? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1, Informative)
Now why anyone would spend $500 on an ATI videocard for Linux.. I have no idea..
Re: (Score:1)
Unfortunately, Red Hat's SATA drive support is still in the dark ages,... ;-)
x1900xt/x friggin awesome... (Score:1)
i didn't install the catalyst control center because it just took up too much space... which is what atitool is for.
Overtake SLI? (Score:2, Interesting)
According to the actual game benchmarks, the score is even. That tone makes it sound like the GeForce SLI was the one in the lead. The Fear benchmark went towards ATi, the next two games were even depending on resolution and the last game went to nVidia.
Re: (Score:2)
He misses the fact that a CrossFire X1950 Pro outperforms a GeForce SLI G80 because he is too focussed on the INCREASE in speed for this configuration. If the SLI card performs at 90% improvement, but the ATI card only gives an 80% improvement, he has discounted SLI as "better" even though the CrossFire configuration gave a higher framerate overall.
It just goes to show, most website
Power consumption comparison? (Score:2)