Ext4 Filesystem Enters Experimental Kernel Tree 237
An anonymous reader writes "Looks like the next version of the venerable Linux 'ext' filesystem is just around the corner. Andrew Morton has added an early version of ext4 to his 2.6.19-rc1-mm1 tree, enabling Linux to support storage volumes up to 1020 petabytes in size, and to write files in 'extents,' or contiguous, reserved areas. According to an article at Linux-Watch, ext4 will be ready for production use within six to nine months, if all goes well. On the downside, the new ext4 filesystem will offer only limited backward compatibility with ext3-aware Linux kernels."
performance (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:1020 Petabytes? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Advantages over XFS, for example. (Score:3, Interesting)
I would also appreciate block journaling for XFS.
Re:1020 Petabytes? (Score:3, Interesting)
Interesting in light of OpenSuSE's decision... (Score:5, Interesting)
to no longer use ReiserFS [wordpress.com] as its default FS (orig. reported on OSNews.com [osnews.com]...don't think I've seen it here yet). I think this came out before the whole Hans Reiser affair, BTW.
SuSE contrasted the ease of upgrading ReiserFS and ExtFS versions:
Comment removed (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:1020 petas (Score:2, Interesting)
Here is why:
Suppose you want to watch porn 24 hours a day from the age of 15 till 75. Thats 60 years = 60 * 365.25 * 24 * 60 * 60 s = 1.89 * 10^9 s
A DivX is around 600 MB / hour = 600 * 1000000 / (60 * 60) = 1.67 * 10^5 B/s
So for your lifetime porn collection you need 1.89 * 1.67 * 10^14 B = 315 TB.
Novell Suse prefers Ext3/Ext4 over ReiserFS 3 / 4 (Score:4, Interesting)
Other Reiser issues aside, the SuSE folks at Novell are looking to leave [linux.com] the nearly unsupported reiserfs3 (in maintenance support, which isn't enough for them) and move to ext3 as their default FS. Why? They feel ext3 is a lot more mature & better/wider supported then reiserfs4, is an easier migration, and appreciate that there is a solid roadmap from ext3 to ext4.
Of course this would also be the week that (coincidentally) Andrew Morton gives reiserfs4 the green light [apcstart.com] for eventual mainline kernel inclusion.
Re:1020 Petabytes? (Score:3, Interesting)
Super computers? Once, maybe - not today, and not for the last decade or so. There are a bunch of companies (I'm working for one of them [netapp.com], now) that will quite cheerfully sell you a storage system that spans hundreds of disks [netapp.com]. Assuming your OS won't flake out when it sees a 500+ TB volume, you could mount it on your desktop, if you want. There's absolutely no need to conflate processing power (super computers) with storage capability (NAS, SAN, etc.)