Google's New Calendar CL2 250
pvt_medic writes "Google is apparently working on its own calendar (CL2) program to integrate with Gmail. The closed beta is ongoing with about 200 participants - people involved are not allowed to invite outsiders to see the calendar and are under strict rules not to share any details with outsiders. Here are some leaked photos of the CL2."
Wild Guess (Score:5, Insightful)
Security? We've heard of it... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Why? (Score:5, Insightful)
In a perfect (or even reasonably sane) world, all platforms and programs would freely exchange XML calendar records. But who am I kidding? That would be too easy. In my world, a PocketPC can't even reliably synchronize calendar information with Outlook.
Re:Too much stuff (Score:5, Insightful)
What web site do you use for search, by the way?
Tinfoil Hat On-Check (Score:5, Insightful)
You're assuming that someone from google didn't leak it.
It's been said that there's no such thing as bad publicity. Making something 'secret' only adds to the interest.
Did Earth Detox Cause Mass Extinctions 65 Million Years Ago? [suvalleynews.com]
Personal Security (Score:5, Insightful)
Whatever happened to the popular Slashdot meme: Don't access [Online Service that requires a password] from public places?
About the only places I would consider 'secure' are home, work, or a friend's house. And I wouldn't be so sure about the friend's house, because some of my friends are sneaky bastards like that.
Taking the Calendar away from a fixed computer, or appt. book or laptop/pda seems like it'll encourage people to check their schedule everywhere. Because, if the point is not to check it anywhere, then why not keep your schedule with you? Home ---> work doesn't seem very troublesome to me.
Re:Why? (Score:5, Insightful)
Finally there is (at least in theory) an answer: CalDAV [webdav.org]. It's big and complex, but there seems to be some real progress in implementing it, just take a look at the interoperability testing events/reports.
Then again, you mentioned Outlook... Just forget everything I said.
cool (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Why? (Score:4, Insightful)
Why XML? vCal is already a standardized calendar format that works with Outlook, Mozilla Sunfire, and many others. It's not a buzzword like XML, but other than that, it usually works well.
Hmm... (Score:2, Insightful)
Doesn't have to be that way. (Score:3, Insightful)
Do you think businesses are going to want their employees scheduling confidential meetings on a calendaring system which Google has full access to? But if it were fully encrypted and only accessed by password locally, this would suddenly be a potent and secure tool which makes the PDA a lot less useful in a networked world.
Re:Why? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Personal Security (Score:3, Insightful)
A lot of this is maybe to do with the decreasing cost of storage. I mean, a website that hosted video files for you would have been unthinkable even only 2 years ago.
It's about time (Score:4, Insightful)
And now it turns out they're working on it.
And just a few months ago, I was hoping that Google would make an Israel version of Google News - and that came out on Tuesday, and looks great.
How often does it happen that a company consistently puts out programs and services that you'd wanted to use before they made them?
Re:Too much stuff (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Too much stuff (Score:3, Insightful)
When I first went to non-technical friends about Google Talk they all said they wouldn't switch to it, they already had AOL.
I use it in Gaim, and when friends log on to get thier mail in Gmail, I can talk to them. It's proven very helpful.
Instead of taking the other IM companies on head on, they're going for a smarter approach.
Re:Too much stuff (Score:3, Insightful)
I mean the satellite option is neat and all, but the speed pretty much sucks if you use that option, the interface is lousy (typing everything in one entry field may appeal to some, not to me), and the direction finding algorithm can sometimes give plenty crap results (like routing a drive from Albuquerque to Cleveland through Denver and Omaha rather than the much shorter straight shot through Oklahoma and Missouri.
About the only thing that they do better than, say Yahoo maps is the panning and zooming control of their maps.