Amazon Hacks For Fun and Money 249
An anonymous reader writes "There's a new BusinessWeek article looking at some of the cool hacks coming out of Amazon's open API and XML feed policy. Some nifty stuff - 27,000 developers have apparently signed up to build hacks on Amazon data. It seems '..most are only part-timers and hobbyists, but a growing number are serious programmers who seek to make a living selling products based on the data Amazon is offering on a silver platter.'"
O'Reilly book on Amazon Hacks (Score:5, Informative)
It's mentioned in the article, but this is slashdot....
Amazon Hacks [oreilly.com]
amazon's strategy (Score:5, Informative)
Re:How long until... (Score:5, Informative)
I suspect it's already been done. A quick USPTO search on "software and price and comparison and internet" yields over 1000 results.
Side note: How can a patent with over 20 references be considered new and innovative? Seriously, that's not genius or inspiration, it's adding 1+1. Looking through the software patents, it's a joke that most of them got granted - the Cheif Patent Officer must be Obvious Guy.
For example this site... (Score:5, Informative)
Neat!
Re:Will Amazon own the "hacks"? (Score:5, Informative)
Compare it to Ebay (Score:4, Informative)
They (meaning idiot analysts for the most part) always say the real battle is between Ebay and Amazon for the future of online commerce. Amazon's got the right idea here, at least when it comes to getting their brand out free. Too bad it costs so much to list...
Are they still... (Score:5, Informative)
Perl (Score:5, Informative)
This is my favorite Amazon hack (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Compare it to Ebay (Score:3, Informative)
It doesn't really cost anything to list on Amazon. When you start out as a seller you only pay Amazon a comission if you sell something. You can list as many items as you want for free.
If you sell in volume then you pay 40$ a month to list and have access to inventory tools etc... If you would list on Ebay you would pay much more than 40$ a month in listing fee for the same volume of listings.
Re:Since when... (Score:5, Informative)
No, it doesn't. [astrian.net]
Re:Amazon (Score:2, Informative)
Well, I suppose some guys might think that's sexy.
My site uses Amazon XML feeds (Score:3, Informative)
DVD Jones [dvdjones.com]
It's a DVD cataloging (and sharing) site that offers recommendations from Amazon filtering out what you already own.
Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA (Score:5, Informative)
That's about what I can piece together knowing what I do about slashdot, television, and bad 80's comedians.
Re:Comparisons between Open Source & Open Data (Score:4, Informative)
For those just awakening from a coma, CDDB started by encouraging people to voluntarily build up their database of music CD fingerprints. Then, when they had enough, they started charging people (developers, mainly) to access the data other people had collected for them. There's nothing keeping Amazon from letting people develop cool hacks over the next few years, then either turning off the service or modifying the terms to such an extent that noone uses it anymore, but using those hacks (developed by others) themselves.
A cool Amazon demo for Mozilla (Score:5, Informative)
Mozilla also has support for various web services, SOAP, XML-RPC and more making it ideal to capitalize on burgeoning amount of raw data in XML sites such as Amazon are offering these days.
Re:How long until... (Score:3, Informative)
Can you, in lets say a day, read and understand any given patent (in your field of expertise) and all of its references, search for prior art (which you can prove was created before the application date and is significantly in common with the patent idea to classify as prior art), and prove to a quality acceptable in a court of law that the patent's idea is not original?
Take one-click-shopping for example. Could you find and verify proof that there exists prior art (the results of a quick google aren't proof), or that the technology is obvious ("it's OBVIOUS to any coder!!!" isn't proof)?
For the record I think the US patent system is a mess, I lament the steps my own country (Australia) takes towards the American way, I have a big problem with the current structure of IP in general (or rather the corruption of it), and while I don't have a solid stance on how software IP should be handled I certainly don't like what's going on at the moment. But opinions and righteous indignation stated on
Perhaps the most vocal slashdotters on this topic should join together, write a clear and concise statement/s on intellectual property as it relates to software (or the patent system as a whole), focussing on benefit to business, creators and the public as well as the original intent of the system, and then deliver it to all relevant politicians/officials. Perhaps include with it a list of all registered voters from
"Here is a list of X thousand voters in your region who will vote against you because of your damaging actions regarding IP" is the easiest way to get a politicians attention short of a large donation.