Jargon File 4.2.0 Out 94
Baloo Ursidae writes, "The newest version of The Jargon File, 4.2.0, is up now over here at jargon.org. For the first time, AFK made the list. " Definitely a good place for newbies, and veterans seeking a few good laughs.
AFK (Score:1)
Big deal (Score:1)
Great, but... (Score:1)
This is really great, but I kinda wish it was version 5.0, and not 4.2. Since they only publish actual books corresponding with the major revisions (4.0, 5.0, etc), I'll have to wait a while longer until I see "The Jargon" on the shelves. I know I could order it, but I buy most books on impulse, it seems like...
arg! (Score:1)
Re:You don't know the POWER of the first post! (Score:1)
Jargon File as Cultural Benchmark (Score:2)
Re:Great, but... (Score:1)
Oh great. (Score:1)
*Sigh...*
Seriously though... Nah... this is the jargon file we're talking about -- IMHO this is more about fun than being serious. 'Cause anybody that tries to speak too much geek in my office finds themselves with a one way ticket out-ta-there.
slashdotted (Score:1)
I love this book, it's made me who i am today..sad (Score:1)
PS: Also, this is the book where i first heard about GEB:EGB and Illuminatus! Two of the best (IMHO) books ever written, if you haven't read them, READ THEM NOW!
*out*
Re:where are the damn diffs? (Score:2)
Re:arg! -- Whoops! (Score:2)
Anyone grab the list before it pooped out on us?
Re:arg! (Score:1)
My Jennicam [jennicam.org] window has updated twice while waiting for it to load.
And it looks like she's waiting for it too...
- - - -
That poor server (Score:4)
So I went looking for mirrors. None of these are official. They are just what a search on Google [google.com] turned up:
I found quite a few more, but all of them on older versions. I certainly don't want to kill either of these two sites, so please folks, if you are mirroring The Jargon File, update your mirrors and post the links.
Mirrors (Score:1)
Nice, but... (Score:1)
Re:arg! (Score:2)
Suggestions for the next iteration (Score:5)
Hemos : A hamster
JonKatz : Producer of social commentary and rant. See Signal/Noise ratio.
Karma : black magic performed by the slash code that follows the rule what goes up must come down.
Troll : A vile creature that lives in the depths of -1 moderation
Natalie Portman : Favorite topic of trolls.
Re:arg! -- Whoops! (Score:4)
List of Jargon Resources Mirror Sites USA:
Australia:
Czechoslovakia: ttp://www.instinct.org/texts/jargon-file/ [ttp]
Finland: http://zone.pspt.fi/jargon/ [zone.pspt.fi]
Germany:
Gret Britain: http://jargon.strugglers.net [strugglers.net]
Greece: http://www.hack.gr/jargon [www.hack.gr]
Italy: http://beatles.cselt.stet.it/mirrors/jargon [cselt.stet.it]
Japan: http://www.vacia.is.tohoku.ac.jp/jargon/ [tohoku.ac.jp]
Norway: http://www.pvv.ntnu.no/misc/jargon/ [pvv.ntnu.no] Poland: http://www.uci.agh.edu.pl/jargon/ [agh.edu.pl]
Spain: http://www.undersec.com/jargon [undersec.com]
Sweden: http://ftp.sunet.se/jargon/ [sunet.se]
U.K.:
Re:arg! (Score:1)
Re:Jargon File as Cultural Benchmark (Score:2)
This is an extremely dumb analogy, IMHO. While this might be a fair comment if you were talking about, say, Jon Johansen, what Linus, Alan, Larry Wall, and the like do has *nothing* to do with circumventing security restrictions.
You are correct in saying we're not likely to get "cracker" generally accepted, but the distinction is (usually, but not always) pretty stark. "cracker", therefore remains useful as a piece of terminology to facilitate discussion amongst ourselves.
Re:Suggestions for the next iteration (Score:1)
Clifford Stoll: To make an end-run around the digital community, then become the darling of conservative, religious, and neo-Luddite media circles by being the one geek who's willing to go on record as hating the whole stinking lot of it.
My mirror @home (Score:1)
Pablo Nevares, "the freshmaker".
Re:Big deal (Score:2)
Yes, there are a lot of those. There are always going to be. And there are going to be candidates whose web sites are declared to be open source with no understanding of what that means. That doesn't mean that the Jargon File itself is useless. First, parts of it are hilarious. But more importantly, it gives a single resource that we can all point to for definitions of hackerly jargon and word play.
No matter how long you've been a hacker, and we were all newbies once, there are going to be terms that are new to you. I remember reading a predecessor to the Jargon File back in the early 80's. I thought I was a programming god because I had written a few barely interesting games in BASIC. And I grew up. I've written a lot of code since then (a million or two lines of code might be a good guess). I know how naive I was then. And I use a fair number of the terms in the Jargon File.
I'm a geek and I'm proud of it.
OFF TOPIC: fortune cookie errata (Score:1)
Why don't you fix your little problem... and light this candle? -- Alan Shepherd, the first man into space, Gemini program
A couple errors here:
1. Alan Shepherd was NOT the first man into space, Yuri Gagarin was. Alan was the first citizen of the US sent into space.
He did say that, but he said it in the Mercury program. Gemini was a bit later.
--
Linux is Linux. GNU just HURDs itself claiming otherwise.
Re:Jargon File as Cultural Benchmark (Score:1)
Yes, perhaps it was a poor analogy, and your comments about using the term ourselves are quite valid. I didn't intend for the PKK thing to be an analogy, more of a demonstration: Most "crackers" refer to themselves as "hackers", so putting a separate name on them confuses the issue so that we end up talking about semantics instead of what constitutes "bad" hacks vs "good" hacks.
What I'm referring to here is when we try to force the usage on the media, or engage in a semantics debate of hacker vs cracker in forums where our time is precious (like syndicated NPR programs, magazine articles, television shows, etc).
Personally, I have a name I'd like to apply to most destructive hackers: convicted felon.
I love the English language, and I love the Jargon File. Both are quite humorous.
Re:where are the damn diffs? (Score:1)
How come all the fuss when 4.2.0 has been out for a couple of weeks already?
Matt.
*yawn* (Score:1)
Congratulations slashdot, you've just slashdotted it
I'll come back tomorrow.
On religious wars and a plea for peace (Score:2)
The confusion stems from ESR's guide. He insists that the proper word for cybercriminal is "cracker", not "hacker". This is true in the geek community, but it is not true in either the general community or the security community. In the security community, the word "crack" has specific connontations about breaking passwords and/or copyright restrictions.
Journalists who use the word "hacker" to refer to the recent DDoS attacks gets flames from nerds insisting that they use "cracker". When they use "cracker", they get flames from security people who tell them what an idiot they are for using the wrong word since no passwords were cracked in these attacks. Most journalists I know try "cracker" a few times before they get sick of the complaints from the security other side. They also realize that their audience (the general population) just doesn't understand the word cracker as well as hacker.
I only post this because I'm tired of religious wars on the "meaning" of words. Words don't have any particular meaning; there is only what people understand when they hear a word. By creating a dictionary that defines a word contrary to how most people use it, ESR is perpetuating a religious war.
One might want to consider this alternate definition of "hacker [robertgraham.com]".
Re: (Score:1)
Has anyone thought about Everything? (Score:1)
-Largos
AFK therefore BAK? (Score:1)
I know, RTFJF, but it's /.ed so I can't check today...
I'd like this Jargon for my Fortune Cookies (Score:2)
Re:Jargon File as Cultural Benchmark (Score:1)
Suggestion for distribution of the JF (Score:2)
Of course, it's not because we want to save bandwidth, it's only to make it more easily readable for those who read earlier versions
Need to fix entry for "Blinkenlights" (Score:2)
Re:Need to fix entry for "Blinkenlights" (Score:1)
Re:Great, but... (Score:1)
--
Re:420!!! good for geeks and potheads alike!! (Score:1)
You gonna pass that or what?
--
Re:arg! (Score:1)
Re:Suggestions for the next iteration (Score:1)
Overhead Transmission: When a statement is beyond your grasp ("over your head.") Also Omega Curve.
Karma Whore! (Score:1)
Re:On religious wars and a plea for peace (Score:1)
First off, ESR didn't invent the difference between "cracker" and "hacker" -- a lot of the community also divides it that way, far more than just people who actually care what ESR says.
Second, if security people are actually complaining to journalists about use of the word "crack", they ought to get a clue. "I cracked a password", "I cracked the copy protection on that software", and "I cracked that site" all have obvious meanings. Hint: the 3rd doesn't mean that I broke some passwords that I could use to break into the site, but didn't actually break in.
Geez.
Re:That poor server (Score:1)
Re:That poor server (Score:1)
And i always thought that one was official, since ESR is maintaining the file...
Anyway, that's the one i've always had bookmarked (although i keep a slightly reformatted mirror on my own box... Look for "Jargon File Flattener" in the comments about v4.1.0 [slashdot.org])
-----
Re:Suggestion for distribution of the JF (Score:1)
Re:Karma Whore! (Score:1)
Me, at the bar, full of Bombay, hating the ugly waitress: "Don't be a karma whore! She's not even cute!"
Everyone-else-I-know, ever since then, whenever someone is being too nice: "Don't be a karma whore!"
None of us really qualify as geeks (I'm pretty much a closet case). And I'm terribly sorry.
Why not just use the CHANGELOG? (Score:2)
SOMEBODY HELP ME!!! (Score:1)
please! somebody, anybody. recommend treatment to reverse the effects. I don't want to live like this!
Re:Jargon File as Cultural Benchmark (Score:2)
It was definitely a classic hack for that machine as it had realtime, hires wireframe graphics with hidden surface elimination, two video modes on the screen at once (!), thousands of worlds to explore and it all fitted into 16k!
Later versions of Elite were never quite as good, IMHO.
The elite homepage is located at http://www.frontier.co.uk/elite.html
dave
Re:Karma Whore! (Score:1)
What's a karma whore? You people don't seriously belive in karma do you?
---
Ayn
Re:Karma Whore! (Score:2)
"Linux is the greatest thing on the planet! It's perfect doodz! I love penguins! I hate Bill Gates and the MPAA"
"I love MS products and you commie pinko Linux users are just not being logical and thoughtful, however I have a real view on the issue, but you aren't going to listen to me"
"I know the moderators are going to mark me down for this, but I just have to say it..."
Posting early in a discussion or as a reply to a high moderation comment with no real content, but including something that no one can really disagree with (except for in one of the cases above)
many replies with the title "Karma whore"
Lea
Well, I dunno, but... (Score:1)
I'm sure CowboyNeal will agree,
Paul "Pavel" Ivanov
GEB:EGB... Oh! I just got it! (Score:1)
This is kinda like when I actually visited the Empire State Building -- I finally realized it was a building in the Empire State!
I'll go back to sleep now...
--
The only way to "really" code (Score:1)
Despite what a lot of people say, some people still maintain that the only way to truly code is to become a Doctor of Technology. Because sure, "hacking around" might allow you to understand how the technology works, but a Doctor must also understand the why - Complexity analysis, the calculus of variables, stuff like that.
Of course, this isn't my theory, I'm just relating what seems to be a common feeling amoung the academic community.
They state: Who would you trust to write your app? John Q. Hacker, James P. Programmer, or Dr. James P. Private ?
Just some thoughts.
C.Villopillil.
Re:Why not just use the CHANGELOG? (Score:2)
Grow Ups Kids (Score:1)
If
The
Probably not as good an idea as I think it is but it's 9am here and I should have started work ages ago.
Jagon file needs more metadata (Score:1)
Ah, the jargon file. Back in '88, when I was a fresher, late one night I printed the entire thing out on the big old (but fast) lineprinter on that concertina-foldy paper.
Re:Jargon File as Cultural Benchmark (Score:2)
http://home.clara.net/cjpinder/elite.html
T
dave "mostly harmless"
journalists? (Score:1)
I'm SURE that the current use of the word has a lot to do with the hours of "hacking away" at the keyboard, and its origin never had anything to do with competence, or programming until the MIT days (although someone who spends many hours doing something is bound to become an expert).
AFK? (Score:1)
Re:Jargon File as Cultural Benchmark (Score:2)
Have you played the Archimedes version of Elite (ArcElite)? It's considered by many to be better than the BBC version. I would agree that the Amiga version and the two DOS versions never quite equalled the original Elite.
Re:journalists? (Score:1)
"Hack" is a word that far predates the typewriter. It comes from the Old English word hakken: To cut irregulary, without skill or definite purpose; to notch; to mangle by repeated strokes of a cutting instrument; as, to hack a post.
The journalistic use of the word is logical and predates computers by quite a bit. A hack writer is one who writes without skill or definite purpose.
The definition has mutated a bit since in the computer era, to come to mean: Originally, a quick job that produces what is needed, but not well.
Once it got that connotation, it continued to mutate to be a particularly brilliant piece of code.
A little time spent over at Dictionary.com - term: Hack [dictionary.com] will clear up definitions and give you actual etymology for most words. Real etymology can be fun, but you've got to have more than a coincidence to create a word's history.
Practice safe linguistics.
LetterJ
Re:I'd like this Jargon for my Fortune Cookies (Score:1)
here [dyndns.org]'s something I hacked up. It may do what you want. Look down the bottom for the one called "fortune.pl".
Jargon hole? (Score:2)
Maybe I'm a Jargon archeologist, since I can't find this on Web searches and deja.com only has my own reference to it I made awhile back, but I distinctly remember the term ATWAV being used a lot Usenet in the 86-89 timeframe. You'd particularly see this on comp.lang.c. I know what it means, but maybe I dreamed the whole thing as you'd think that it would show up on a web page somewhere.
I'm really surprised that it doesn't seem to be on the Web now... Does anybody else remember ATWAV and what it refers to?
-Jordan Henderson
Re:The only way to "really" code (Score:1)
However, I'm not saying that higher education is A Bad Thing, I'm just saying that how much education you have isn't necissarily a reflection on your programming ability or trustworthyness.
Re:New ones (Score:1)
--
Re:AFK? (Score:1)
Re:That poor server (Score:1)
I've started redirecting www.jargon.org to ESR's site, so the ISP should be much happier now...
(BTW, www.jargon.org is just another mirror. I registered the name because I'm a big fan.)
Re:Why not just use the CHANGELOG? (Score:1)
#!/usr/bin/perl
# The path to the changelog.
$changelog = "/home/httpd/html/jargon/jargon-upd.lst";
open CHANGELOG, $changelog;
@file = <CHANGELOG>;
close CHANGELOG;
print "Content-Type: text/plain\n\n";
print "This is supposed to be a list of all new entries in the jargon files changelog.\n\n";
foreach $post (reverse sort split (/\*\*\* (?=.* \*\*\*)/, "@file"))
{
($type, $check ) = split (/
if ($type eq "New" && $check eq "in")
{
print $post;
}
}
Re:GEB:EGB... Oh! I just got it! (Score:1)
Re:The only way to "really" code (Score:1)
Re:Jargon File as Cultural Benchmark (Score:2)
Never had an Arc, although always wanted one. It was a screaming power machine when it came out first.
Ah the good old days of the personal computer world, when compatibility was a weird concept.
dave "now elite on the palm pilot, there's a challenge..."
[1] Top two-thirds in a monochrome more, bottom third in colour.
Re:Suggestion for distribution of the JF (Score:1)