smittyoneeach's Journal: No. 4 Will Warm Fusty's Heart

https://www.activistpost.com/2016/01/9-ways-to-stop-cooperating-with-the-ruling-elites-control-system.html

4. Don't vote for any of the major political parties

By voting for one of these parties you're only giving your power away to help the ruling criminals' further advance their NWO agenda. Stop believing the Republican-Democrat paradigm; or, if you're in the UK, the Lib-Lab-Con sock puppet campaign shows backed and financed by T.H.E.Y (The Hierarchy Enslaving You).

It doesn't matter who gets voted in. They're all funded and backed by the ruling elite. So whoever wins, the politicians who get in office will only be there to serve their lords and masters the ruling elite instead of the wishes of we-the-people.

Yes, there are a growing number of people who know this, but many still don't fully understand. Any advantages of selecting one party over the other because of, say, a policy in your favor or to your advantage will only be a short-term payoff. In the end, if you vote for one of the major parties because of this then you'll only have to suffer the far greater long-term cost for having chosen the party with their connections to the ruling elite's agenda.

Well, that's good as far as it goes. But how are we precluding THEY from controlling, say, a JFKjr?

The improved answer is to seize control at the local level. Fair enough.

But at that point, one discovers that the system runs backward; the money is borrowed and comes down the food chain, rather than having local taxes fund matters and move up the food chain to fund the government.

Money, we know, is mostly fungible with power. I'd fall short of directly equating them, but that amounts to a quibble.

The rest of The Famous Article is interesting and worth discussion as well.

JFKjr?

[fustakrakich]

I believe he is far beyond any earthly control...

And taxes are handed out to the financial industry, leaving very little to fund the government, does seem kinda backwards, doesn't it? But that's what we continue to vote for, so, c'est la vie...

How are the ruling elite and their associates going to deal with us if we demonstrate our non-cooperation in high numbers?

Extermination, that's usually how it works... Ruling "elite"? Better to call them ruling psychopaths, or just plain old pirates

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

So, you recommendation is to assume the position and wait for destruction by our "ruling psycopaths"?

Re:

[fustakrakich]

Not at all, again you reverse what I write, I said let's take our chances, said that from the beginning, but given past history, let's not pretend that it will be pleasant, wealth/power isn't given up voluntarily or peaceably, never has been, nut maybe there is a first time. Worth a try, right? Unlike your Article V, it's a personal choice that every individual has to make for themselves, truly the only chance for change comes from us, here in the present, not the mystical, mythical past

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

again you reverse what I write

I'm seeking to understand the actual implementation of what you say.

I said let's take our chances

Politics is the effort to minimize chance.

Unlike your Article V, it's a personal choice that every individual has to make for themselves

Personal choices like diet and exercise are one thing. We do not, for example, make personal choices on legal tender and traffic laws. I'm curious how you draw the personal/public choice line.

the only chance for change comes from us

Sure, but if the crew doesn't row together, the boat goes nowhere. I agree with you that smaller is better, and the more granular the system, the lower the tyranny. But the only winners when everyone approaches

Re:

[fustakrakich]

We do not, for example, make personal choices on legal tender and traffic laws.

We do when we delegate the job. But like you said, we put that on autopilot also, no thinking required

Sure, but if the crew doesn't row together, the boat goes nowhere.

Yeah, well, you know, cooperation and all that seem to be overrated, gotta use a whip to keep 'em in sync

Which was why the Tea Parties had their backsides handed to them.

That happened when enough people realized their charade is a fraud.

You are just repeating everybody's excuses to avoid personal responsibility for the government you elect. The choice to follow is personal and has consequences

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

You are just repeating everybody's excuses

I guess if I were claiming victim status, rather than simply describing the situation, you'd be closer to having a point. I do consider you first and foremost a troll.

The choice to follow is personal and has consequences

Well, yes. One is not a scofflaw, and pays taxes. Social contract, and all. Despite copious issues, said contract has not fully broken down. Not everyone can attain your full-on Grizzly Adams status.

Re:

[fustakrakich]

Yes, you are playing the "victim" card. If that revelation is "trolling", whatever... The voters are not "victims" of anything but their own choices. We have a government that's just like us, it is in our image

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

I've never claimed that I'm a victim. I've pointed out that you've demanded binary choices of me, and laughed at them.

Humanity won 2k years ago. Through that, I ask the Lord to bless you.

Re:

[fustakrakich]

I'm not demanding anything. The choices you have are there, they didn't come from me. They are mere observations of reality, your Roman mythology doesn't relate

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

The choices you have are there, they didn't come from me.

You stated that I have to choose Christ OR Trump. Or was that my lyin' eyes out running amok again?

Re:

[fustakrakich]

You stated that I have to choose Christ OR Trump.

Yes, that is a statement of fact, not a demand coming from me. I mean, if you want to live with the conflict, knock yourself out, but the conflict couldn't be more obvious. You are just in denial of the truth. Repent, before it's too late

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

There is simply no conflict whatsoever existing outside of the borders of your mind, for reasons that I have laid out in detail. But you do you.

Re:

[fustakrakich]

The conflict is set in stone. It cannot be resolved. Your Trump and Christ don't mix. You cannot have both. You're just rationalizing.

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

OK, I'll bite: in what larger context, and by what objective rules, do you think this judgement possible?

Re:

[fustakrakich]

"Objective"? What is there about your Christ that is objective? It's all legend, without any objective evidence whatsoever. I'm comparing Trump to a mythical person, and the evidence of conflict there is painfully obvious. You're still looking for a workable excuse, but you still can't have both. Instead of distractions, just choose one or the other, or, like it or not, your sincerity will remain in doubt

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

OK, I'll repeat:

OK, I'll bite: in what larger context, and by what objective rules, do you think this judgement possible?

Deflecting toward the Carpenter is just saying "I got nothing."

Re:

[fustakrakich]

No, you have nothing. There is no "larger context", that's more of your regular deflection from the choice you need to make to be taken seriously about where your faith is placed, the legend, or the politician, it's one or the other.

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

Well, you are correct. I do indeed have nothing, outside the Carpenter. Just standing around, awaiting the last heartbeat, so that I can return to the dust from which all have come.

Re:

[fustakrakich]

return to the dust from which all have come.

Ya don't say!

So, "smart dust" then?

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

Smart enough to post here, apparently.

Re:

[fustakrakich]

Oh, I'm not sure if you know you're talking about a Dead Kennedy

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

I'm talking about Jello Biafra.

No, really, I meant RFKjr.