Journal robi2106's Journal: Still Think Universal Health Care Is A Good Idea? 17
Filmmaker Stuart Browning shows the callousness of "single-payer", government-run health care systems as practiced in Canada.
When a person has to wait 8 months for surgery, or 4 months just for a MRI, then you know there is a problem with your health care system. And when your single-payer, aka-government monopoly, system is struck down as unconstitutional in one province, that should be another red flag. There are many more examples of why a universally poor monopoly on a service, especially a life threatening / saving service, is a bad idea.
Give that video a look-see. Enlightening to say the least. The Libertarian in me shudders to think of this scenario playing out in the US.
jason
unnecessary dichotomy (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
If a government system is NOT a monopoly but is competing against private business, I believe, the private business will move quicker to satisfy demand an
Re: (Score:2)
There are a number of glaring holes in your argument. First and foremost, there is no reason why universal health care can't be provided in a market-based, yet regulated system. Such a system exists and works in much of Europe (and is not socialized medicine, either). Germany's has worked (with some modifications) for nearly 120 years -- it ain't perfect, but it works a damned sight better than America's (much cheaper and with better coverage, without rationing). Second, there is no reason why universal hea
Re: (Score:2)
Hmm- an MRI in 8 months (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Thus making my Technocratic bid for the presidency more reasonable. Not much, as I'll lose no matter what I do, but heck, I'm 36 and losing the Presidency of the United States is now my Constitutional Right!
but the way you never let reality intersect with your opinions. that's one of the reasons i love you.
In my high school senior photo (1989 Silverton Union High School, Oregon) I'm weari
The problem isn't with universal health care. (Score:1)
The other option is to reduce demand, but not through raising costs. You can (and should) take preventative measures like eliminating carcinogens and air pollution. But you also need to train the populace in what does and doesn't require treatment. Or train them to perform some treatment on their own.
Supply/demand economi
Re: (Score:2)
We're working on reducing demand by, for example, public pressure to force people to quit smoking (eliminating it in the workplace, restaurants and bars, etc).
Also, while some people have to wait, its because there are other cases that are more urgent, that jump the queue. It might not be "fair", but it saves lives. Someone who needs a CT scan or MRI in a life-and-death situation will get it - there's no "lets see if they have insurance first".
A DC evangulast of this is here. (Score:1)
Americans have the world's MOST expensive (Score:2)
The quality of care is argued to be between the 20th and 40th best in the world.
Someone is ripped-off, big time. If being "libertarian" means "hands off, man. This is gonna' work out. To intervene is EVIL," then libertarian is nothing but another name for "useful idiot."
Re: (Score:2)
This is one of the reasons why health care rates grow 12% - 15% per year (and have for more than a decade) when the rest of the country grows a
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I agree. (Score:1)
I think that any form of helath care won't work, because there is no accountability to usage. With auto insurance, you are not supposed to get benefits, if you are risky, or if it's your fault. There are no boundaries like that in health care.