Do you really live somewhere far from any charger stations? This sounds unlikely.

And that's why we still don't have computers, and never will.

...or possibly just one like it. It excluded concepts such as news aggregators. I get my news online, and most of it comes from established media, but I'm not following any particular site. I go through news aggregators such as Google News, and I can count on the hot stuff to be repeated on Reddit ad nauseum.

Whether aggregators were deliberately excluded from the poll is unclear. They could just be clueless.

Right, because our laws are created by an all-knowing and benevolent government that only has our best interests at heart.

The fact that they're charging the vehicle owner, not the driver, should make it clear that this is an illicit cash grab.

A. Can't happen.
B. Is totally unrelated to the purpose of the law, which has nothing to do with children.

Well, that could be a problem, seeing as apartment and condo dwellers typically have perfectly good options to install their own oil wells and refining plants. Right?

This may come as a surprise to you but, you can recharge EVs at service stations, just like old-fashioned combustion vehicles.

Addiction sounds like a more plausible problem than witchcraft to most of us. The word even had a meaning, once! If you were an addict and stopped using your drug of choice, you'd be facing chills, sweats, vomiting, and convulsions.

Oddly enough, that hardly ever happens when you stop using social media.

What? Oh. Hard drives.

Whatever. Close enough.

Well, that's simply terrible. Can't they be employed doing something else that's completely worthless?

You're telling me that now companies are trying to sell people things that they might want to buy? Oh noes! How horrible!

American car makers are apparently scared sheepless that Chinese EVs would be a big hit. As usual, they employ the government to screw with the market instead of improving their vehicles. Your take on this should be to accept their evaluation that American cars aren't worth buying.

Well... beyond... the...

Look, sonny, who do you think invented the Internet? No, it wasn't Al Gore (if you're even old enough to understand that reference). I didn't have to call in my grandchildren to set up my smart home for me, which is just as well, because they wouldn't have the faintest clue where to begin. Also, I don't have any grandchildren, but my hypothetical is better than yours!

Are we to understand that your parents are technologically incompetent, and you assume that must apply to everyone else's parents?

This study notes that it has defined "frequent use" to mean "a few times a week", which most people would consider "occasional" rather than "frequent". It then goes on to use the word "frequent" according to this fraudulent definition.

If you can simultaneously focus on both far and near objects, you are definitely not human. That's not how eyes work at all.

What they have demonstrated is a remote-controlled toy. I'm sure it's charming.