Comment Re:Clippy didn't walk (Score 1) 54
Irrelevant to what I replied to, which was about Clippy.
Try to participate in the same conversation as the grownups.
Irrelevant to what I replied to, which was about Clippy.
Try to participate in the same conversation as the grownups.
Clippy was trivial to kill. You just had to know how (to use a search engine).
People are wondering that now.
Society needs for absolutists of all kinds to not like a lot of things.
Some people believe that those they don't like shouldn't have rights.
Or read the news for you and make up what it expect you want to hear.
I know which I find more likely.
You know what they say about assuming . . .
Plus, assuming isn't science.
Did they also do a round to determine the best drip coffee? And the best drip coffee maker.
I mean, really, if you compare the best instant against the worst drip, made in a decade old Mr. Coffee that's never been cleaned, or even had the mold scraped out, yeah, the drip will win just for not being . . . lumpy.
(Not that I care about toxic bean waste to begin with. All coffee tastes like ass. I'll never understand how anything that smells that good can taste that bad.)
But you'll have to buy the wall wart separately, it won't come with the car.
We'll be seeing EVs with USB-C charging ports.
> , they simply created it in the equivalent of typing numbers into a spreadsheet and saying "voila!"
This is how fiat operates too, via the digital banking systems.
But generally with considerably more oversight, and generally run by people who have actually studies economics (even if they don't really understand it), rather than pot smoking frat boys who think it's funny to rip people off.
This is why proof-of-work coins are superior to any currently known monetary system.
Other than having no actual value whatsoever, except what you con out of people below you in the pyramid, sure.
Like it or hate it, approve of disapprove, if it (ever) works, it will be used.
Standing in the way of progress is a sure fire way to be run over by it.
Banks aren't perfect by any means, but they understand risk. It seems the crypto bros really don't.
"Go fast and break things." I think they do. They just don't care, because they believe (usually righty) that the risk is to someone else.
That this is even possible is pretty conclusive proof that the basic design of their entire system is a scam. They didn't mine $300 trillion is scam coins, they simply created it in the equivalent of typing numbers into a spreadsheet and saying "voila!"
The fact that BMI categories do not take into account age, or sex, is one, or rather two, of the biggest reasons why it's so deeply flawed. Any standard that says that men and women of the same height should have the same weight is dangerous quackery.
When you change the cutoff overweight from 27.5 to 25, the absolute number of people who are now overweight will go up.
It's not rocket science.
People are always available for work in the past tense.