Was ventilator usage tested in double blind studies for COVID-19? How about lockdowns? Or cloth masks? Or those Chinese street fire-trucks that atomize bleach or something. HCQ is a lightening rod in a field of unknowns because Orange Man said something about it. The reality is very little is truly understood about COVID-19.
...to its original audience. It is 2020 and the "news for nerds" site is publishing polls on software like this ignoring established and well known FOSS options like Jitsi Meet and Big Blue Button.
If you forget about Free and open-source software in this day and age your nerd card is revoked indefinitely. Sorry folks.
The new, cleaned-up, polished Amiga operating system for your 68K machine fixes all the small annoyances that have piled up over the years. Originally intended as a bug-fix release, it also modernizes many system components previously upgraded in OS 3.9.
Contrary to its modest revision number, AmigaOS 3.1.4 is arguably as large an upgrade as OS 3.9 was, and surpasses it in stability and robustness. Over 320K of release notes cover almost every aspect of your favourite classic AmigaOS — from bootmenu to datatypes.
while I don't fully agree with the implementation of systemd I do think conceptually it is far superior to what it replaces, and though is more complex is not THAT complex, and in return you get more flexibility and can do more (setting up services to start in parallel, easily make services restart or trigger other actions on failure etc)
In my experience managing systemd unit files is GREAT! You can (and should) leave the ones installed by the package/source alone and maintain separate files with your own overrides. It is super easy to manage services when you actually take the time to learn how it works.
Systemd has its problems yes, and it was foisted upon users too quickly, but it is 2017, the gripes are overstated or outdated, and the old init.d stuff truly is an old rotten pile of crap. Jury is out on the other systemd stuff that does logging etc.
Also systemd is NOT really monolithic technically speaking...it is actually quite modular. It is the *project management* that is modular, and the modules are "tightly coupled" vs. old school loosely coupled though pipes etc. like I and many others prefer and/or are used to.
I wish half the effort that went into b!tching and moaning would go into a decent alternative but compatible alternative/fork to systemd (ie. works with same unit files etc). There are real reasons systemd came to be (and no, it isn't just some conspiracy by a certain Linux vendor)...if you do not like it DO something about it.
...they are just joining the rest of the world's pricing strategy:
* airlines set ticket prices largely based on willingness to pay, which is why a short flight between Calgary and Ft.McMurray in Canada full of oil workers costs more than a flight from Canada to Europe or Asia.
* hotels price their rooms based not only on demand but where their customers are visiting from...Americans often get better Vegas deals than Canadians and Europeans, and room prices go up during conventions so the "special convention rate" looks like a deal even though it is pretty much the same rate as non peak.
* Microsoft and most other closed source software companies charge higher prices in Europe and North America in isolation of actual demand because of their willingness to pay more in licensing.
Uber's pricing model was destined to become more complex and opaque...I'm sure bistro math is incorporated somehow at this point. It's like entropy really.
Except that technology exists today to scan your id...and even use face recognition to compare it to the user to make sure it isn't someone else's ID. It wouldn't be perfect but it would be more reliable than most clerks.
Given away. It is BS to say the use of personal information as currency is "clearly stated" in the terms of service. The Big Five make ZERO effort to ensure users have read and understand how they are paying for the services they offer for "free". They write long form legalese, and they present a little Web link labelled " as have read the terms of service" next to a checkbox in the sign up and there is no mechanism whatsoever to ensure a person has read it.
It is partly our fault for lying by checking the box without following the link, but companies do the absolute minimum required to inform users. They in fact go out of their way to hide their terms.
It's as if a store leaves their stuff on a shelf, without price tags, but a sign saying "take and enjoy!" with fine print saying "you agree to the terms of the agreement available at the customer service desk" underneath. Then when they get home they discover their bank account cleaned out. They go back to the store and they say sorry you agreed to the terms by taking the stuff. It's not our fault you didn't go to customer service desk to get the 5 page agreement stating we have full access to your bank account and can take whatever you want and that we do not take returns.
The point is they are using their services as bait, and their behaviour wouldn't be tolerated when the currency is cash and the product is tangible. Society does not yet appear to value personal information like cash. People give it freely, corporations leverage it however they please without regard to consequences and governments forcefully take whatever they want to further their agendas. Perhaps one day we will live in a Roddenberry style economy without cash and the new currency will be information and it will be valued and respected accordingly, but we are far from that point right now.
"An ounce of prevention is worth a ton of code." -- an anonymous programmer