Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
For the out-of-band Slashdot experience (mostly headlines), follow us on Twitter, or Facebook. ×

Comment: Bad news to all these recycled water protesters... (Score 1) 278 278

...you have been drinking "toilet to tap" your entire lives. You think animal urine doesn't make it into the rivers and groundwater supplies? Where, exactly, do you think all that stuff that goes into septic tanks goes?

Comment: Re:With the best will in the world... (Score 1) 486 486

The one advantage with using renewable energy for this is that since you are making a fuel that can be stored, the intermittent nature of certain sources (solar, wind) won't matter. Bright sunny day? Make fuel. Cloudy night? Just wait for the next sunny day to make fuel. No big deal.

Comment: 'Sacred' is the magic word... (Score 3, Interesting) 228 228

If you are a native of any kind, just start yelling that something is sacred, and nobody will be able to fight back against you.

Hate stuff being built near you? Just claim you can't build there because it is sacred ground.

Want something built, like a casino or giant housing development? Just claim the land is sacred and demand it back as 'sovereign' territory... so that you can build your casino.

You get to have it both ways!

Comment: Trust us... (Score 1) 200 200

Instead, the department would only use the power if it was acting on "some intelligence or observation of abnormal behaviour", she said

And that 'intelligence' or 'observation' will be totally classified (you know, because of national security and stuff), so there will be no way to verify if there was actually a valid reason to break into your iPhone. But don't worry, we won't abuse this new power.

Comment: Re:Get rid of the financial incentive... (Score 1) 760 760

Currently the money goes to the city/police department, not the 'town'. They have a financial incentive to hand out more fines. I want the money to NOT go to the city/police department so that they will not have a financial incentive to hand out more fines. So, no, I do not want to 'increase that effect', I want to do the complete opposite.

Comment: Re:Get rid of the financial incentive... (Score 1) 760 760

Why? Because you think a guy with millions per year cannot afford a lawyer if he's victim of crooks?

No, because right now there is no financial incentive for cops to go after more expensive cars in the hopes of getting a big payday for their department. You make the fines income based and guess who they will go after the most?

Comment: Re:Get rid of the financial incentive... (Score 1) 760 760

I thought about that, but then who determines what charity the money goes too, and who gets how much? The tax refund takes out any decision making (i.e. bribing) by the politicians, and individuals could donate their refund if they choose.

Comment: Get rid of the financial incentive... (Score 5, Insightful) 760 760

If you thought it was bad how cops were targeting/ticketing poor people, wait until the police realize they can fund their whole budget if they can ticket a guy like Zuckerberg once or twice!

Before a system like this is in place, the financial incentive for cops to ticket people needs to be removed. Any fines need to be given back to the community via some type of property/income/sales tax rebate, rather than back to the city (which in essence goes back to the cops that are handing out the fines). For example, if $1,000,000 in fines were collected for a town with 10,000 property tax assessments, they could knock $100 off of each tax bill.

The same needs to be done with civil asset forfeitures. If there was ever a clearer case of conflict of interest, I haven't seen it.

Comment: Telephone? (Score 2) 169 169

Swedish prosecutors are arranging to come to London and question Assange within the embassy

Sweden still needs to be granted permission from both the UK and Ecuador.

The phone, motherfuckers, pick it up and CALL HIM WITH YOUR QUESTIONS!!! I am constantly amazed at how people in charge of important things can make simple tasks so convoluted.

Comment: Re:So did he write facebook or not? (Score 1) 163 163

... they hadn't given me the shares in the company that they had been promising for the previous 9 years.

NINE YEARS?!?!??! You went without a written contract for your work for nine years? How many years were you going to work like this? Twenty? Thirty?

Getting the job done is no excuse for not following the rules. Corollary: Following the rules will not get the job done.

Working...