And of collisions between drivers and pedestrians, 64 percent were the driver’s fault.
Given what I've seen of how pedestrians acted when I worked in SF years ago, I'm shocked that that number isn't reversed towards pedestrians being more at fault. They routinely waited OUT IN THE STREET for the light to change, rather than stay two steps back on the nice, safe sidewalk. It was truly the most bizarre pedestrian behavior I have seen in a city. They also would start crossing a busy six lane main road when there was no chance for them to make it across before the light changed. Many times I would be in the far right lane, and couldn't see pedestrians meandering across because of large trucks to my left. Light turns green, I start to go, and... whoops! Almost hit a clueless pedestrian.
But driving 3000 miles on a martian landscape with a rover-like vehicle while pulling another vehicle is quite a far stretch.
If I remember the book correctly, the rovers were designed to be towed. And he carried the solar cells to recharge the batteries each day. And electric motors have incredible torque (perfect for towing at slow speeds). What is it that makes that scenario a stretch?
"With one line of code you can break down how it happened," Kaul said. He described an "'if' statement with two clauses: If you do this, then do that. If something doesn't happen, do this."
Shit, I already knew that, and I only know some basic programming. Wake me when someone explains some technical details of how the engine ran in test mode and in real world driving.
Soft drinks are carefully formulated to be addictive and not quench thirst.
I can believe the first, but what would be the point of the second? If I drink something, and it doesn't quench my thirst, I'm not very likely going to be drinking that next time I'm thirsty. That would be like selling marijuana that don't really deliver a very good high. Besides, I seldom drink soda to 'quench my thirst'. I drink it because it is so damn tasty!
Are We Reaching the Electric Car Tipping Point?
Nope. Next obvious 'no' question, please.
"Electric cars will be better than any alternative, including the loud, inconvenient, gas-powered jalopy,
Loud? Inconvenient? This guy seems to have no clue how a modern gas-powered car works (I have no idea what a jalopy is. Maybe a French word for 'car'?) Another person who thinks people don't like their gas-powered car, even though we gladly buy them by the millions.
The Tesla Model S has demonstrated that a well made, well designed electric car is far superior to anything else on the road. This has changed everything."
I can buy a pretty awesome gas-powered car for $100k. Tesla keeps promising something under $50k, but until I see them out on the road, it is just vaporware. The next person who brings up the Tesla as some type of viable alternative to a $20k gas-powered car gets a timeout in the corner.
So, gay marriage was ALWAYS legal (constitutionally) and just now found out?
No. There was no constitutional protection of gay marriage until the SCOTUS ruled on it. It WAS illegal (in states banning) but now it is not. Slavery was legal at one point to. Lots of things that we consider bad now were perfectly legal. Times and minds change.
Your viewpoint, not mine.
So, believe everything said by 9 people in black robes about law is correct? Even when the overturn previous rulings made by the same court?
Belief in a ruling isn't required for it to be in force. I disagree with lots of legal rulings, but I still must abide by them. And courts overturn rulings as arguments, times, and minds of the general population change over time.
I am quite clear that not all things that are "illegal" are "wrong". I'm wondering why that is so hard for people to grasp.
Where did 'wrong' come up in this thread? The OP only mentioned Uber being illegal (in his opinion). I feel that you are trying to make arguments that no one else is making.
What makes it intrinsically illegal? Just because there is a law?
Uh, yeah. That's kind of how that works.
I wonder how you feel about Illegal Aliens (er Undocumented residents).
I feel that they are here... illegally?
Gay Marriage was illegal just a few months ago in a wide number of places in the US.
Yeah, there were laws against it, so it was illegal. Those laws were ruled unconstitutional, so those laws are void. Now gay marriage is legal.
So you believe that business models deserve protection from competition by creating legal loops that do not do anything except protect economic interests?
No, just that all businesses operate under the same set of rules and laws.
Is there some part of this that is confusing to you?
I am NOMAD!