It's kind of surprising how little press coverage Artemis has gotten. People flew around the moon.

Seriously? Turn your brain on. You can think better than that.

I can accept art as communication, but how do you consider it dialogue? A dialogue requires the listener to respond in some way, it's a two way communication. How is the listener answering back to the artist?

The people who don't have a problem with it aren't complaining.

It's clearly not real, but cartoons are also clearly not real. And we enjoy cartoons.

Everything you said is right, but it doesn't lead to the conclusion. Yes, actors have lots of skills. But that doesn't answer the question:

If AI can do the job of an actor, why would acting deserve special protection from automation?

WLM = Windows Live Mail

A good idea would be to create a "peace department" to balance the war department, one that puts serious resources into studying peace and how to make it a reality.

Currently Trump is enacting a non-violent approach (blockading Iranian shipping) so I don't know why you are confused by this.

You can just leave it there, because compared to you, the BBC is a beacon of objectivity. You are biased.

You're supposed to say, "If you gaze into Sam Altman's orb, it will save the children!" No one cares about scalpers, think of the children.

I think the problem was installing exFAT drivers on a device (like a camera) required the manufacturer pay a licensing fee.

[Citation Needed]

Your post is a Gish Gallop. You fail at logic, in particular you didn't provide sources.

Furthermore, I think you are insipid for lying in this way. Worse, you won't change, you won't learn to use logic.

I hope you never use a Gish Gallop again.

This is clear motivated reasoning. You're falling for logical fallacies. You wouldn't recognize unbias if it smashed you in the head like a baseball, because you don't know how to be unbiased. I don't know how you graduated from High School. Standards are declining, I guess.

Here's your problem: to you, the meaning of "unbiased" is "agrees with me." That is why you are wrong. That's why you fall for motivated reasoning, because BBC executives resigned when unethical bias was discovered, but you won't fix your own bias.

And so you will stay wrong, because you won't fix the problems in your cognitive reasoning when discovered. You'll just pick up and carry on like nothing happened.

There are definitely more things that could have been done.