How can the media and government put their spin on events when it is documented from various angles by several people?

I'll just be pulling into random McDonald's/Starbucks

Sucks since I don't have a data plan... But an (very short) explanation is here http://productforums.google.com/forum/#!msg/websearch/yKG7BGro7QQ/ntAXQWWKj70J

A threatening note was tied to a chair and flung through a window at Apple headquarters.

Apple pays about 42 bucks per 64gb chip. I'm sure MS isn't getting as good of a deal, yet at least... I'm assuming the markup isn't some insane amount for what most people would think is a premium feature.

since this is in india, they probably mean "muslims"

I agree with you 100%.

I am a baker and normal dragées just don't work the same.

Winner tonight: Federal Reserve reckless money printing.

At least when a business does it, I know they're doing it for profit. But when the government gets together with bankers on a private island then passes the law on Christmas Eve, you just get a little uneasy that it may be for some other reason.

They're both in the business of creating money out of thin air, so of course they'd see a problem with it.

not quite. religion is voluntary. that's the problem with the political sphere: if dictators ruled by voluntary consent of the people, they wouldn't be dictators, would they?

On Thursday, the Morning Joe panel focused its attention on whether there’s the potential for a conflict of interest given tonight’s vice presidential debate moderator, ABC News’ Martha Raddatz, counted Barack Obama — then a Harvard law student — among the guests at her 1991 wedding.

where is federal reserve/monitory policy question?

The economic and oil supply aspects of the story are something I couldn't care at all about. It's the BS war that no one wants that's about to erupt.