The intersection of people who don't want to follow the CDC's vaccination schedule (for whatever reason, legitimate or otherwise) and people with some resources has got to be somewhat reasonably sized (eg: look at all the wealthy areas with well-informed people who don't buy into the "everything is safe" propaganda). That says growth industry in servicing the desire to avoid public school to me...
Agreeing with this: no issues with the iPhone 6.
I've had Windows (a while ago), Android (stock, Motorola), Cyanogen, and iOS. iOS is, by a good margin, the best "just works" OS for a smart phone, imho. Second is probably Windows at the moment, although I'd favor Cyanogen if you're not going iOS, because at least then you get some additional control of your device, rather than just a different walled garden. As always, stock Android brings up the rear, because not only do vendors fill it with bloatware, and it has long-standing usability issues that the devs simply don't care to fix (looking at you, unlock-on-bluetooth bug), but it rarely gets patched longer than a year out or so, so it gets inevitably worse over time.
... are people just dumb, or is there an ulterior motive to this suggestion?
I mean, we already have a huge problem that the police are, in many cases, giving citations motivated much more by revenue generation then public safety. And this suggestion... would make that problem much worse.
I've got a suggestion: how about we try to address the massive corruption, spying for the government, rights violations, lack of accountability, and near-total diversion between stated goals and objective reality in law enforcement, before we worry about how to squeeze a bit more indirect taxation from the populace. Or, I don't know, maybe recognize this "suggestion" as underhanded PR for simply more taxation.
Hm... not sure extending the reddit echo chamber effect to the entire effective internet is really a good idea, especially for diversity of ideas.
Then again, as someone else mentioned, there will always be other search engines. Back in the day, Yahoo only showed you the big, popular sites... and then a search engine called google which showed everything.
1. Try to innovate the controller(s), to get them closer to real instruments, while preserving the fun factor and low cost.
2. Instead of trying to squeeze hundreds of dollars out of people with DLC songs, allow people to create and share songs for free, and release a few new official songs a month for free. That way you build goodwill, and your game is perceived as a good (and increasing) value over time.
Just my 2c.
I mean, it's not absurd to raise it, but it's pretty absurd that's it's considered in any way debatable. I mean, if it was a question between the law, and a contract I made with an arbitrary third party which allowed me to kill people with impunity, which has more legal power? The law, of course. By the nature of contract law, you cannot make something which is otherwise illegal legal, just because you have a contract which allows you to do it.
In the same way, the government spying on people in unconstitutional, regardless of whatever BS contracts they might make with each other and/or third parties. Duh. That's not going to stop anyone in the government from ignoring the law or human rights, of course, but it's absurd that there's any question of the technical legality.
I had an Android phone which I eventually was able to root/mod; here's some advice, for what it's worth:
- Get a device which has a supported root/mod path via XDA. Some devices are more rootable than others.
- Be careful about updates; most root tools only work for specific versions, and patches regularly break rooting methods/scripts.
- If you want to preserve root, you'll want to run a cusom ROM, so find a device which has a supported mainstream ROM for it.
- Unless you are an expert, it will take a while. Plan on spending at least a week of off/on time messing with it, and be prepared if you brick it.
- If you want full control of the device, plan to make this your full-time job. Nobody really offers this, and you'll need to do it yourself.
- If you just want something with reasonable privacy controls which just works, get an IOS device; that's what I did eventually.
Also, as a side note:
- The regular web does suck, and browsing without an ad blocker these days is pretty horrible. Mainly posting to say that.
I'm not sure Apple Pay will "win", but I'm absolutely certain CurretC will "lose". It's a great change for the merchants, and horrible for the consumers (in contrast to Apple Pay, which is neutral for merchants, and positive for consumers). Unless the merchants stop taking credit cards (and I think that's unlikely), CurrentC is already dead.
Sure, everyone running TOR on their gateway for all internet traffic would be horribly inefficient. Sure, it would preclude some things, like IP multi-casting and content geo-caching.
But you know what? It would pretty much make net neutrality a de facto standard, irrespective of what the horribly corrupt FCC decides. And you know what else? It would effectively end the NSA's collection of everyone online activity. Oh, and you would get all the privacy benefits for free, forever.
On balance, given the openly hostile actors in the government, I think it would be worth it.
For those who don't see why this is bad, consider this:
In order to route/cache by data, the data must be visible to the routing nodes; in essence, you would no longer be able to use end-to-end encryption. You could still have point-to-point (eg: encryption for wireless connections), but everything would be visible to routing nodes, by necessity. This means no more hiding communications from the government (who taps all the backbone routers), no TOR routing, no protection from MTM attacks, by design. You get the promise of more efficiency, at the cost of your privacy/freedom... and guess what, you'll get neither in this case, too.
I don't run a local firewall on my work system, for reference. As a developer, it's common to need to have "random" ports open for various things for testing, and having to deal with a firewall is one more nuisance I don't want to account for. A local (on system) firewall won't prevent most attacks anyway, so I don't feel I'm giving up much real security.
I do run a local firewall at home, but only because it has not annoyed me enough to be disabled yet.
I don't know how useful that information is; consider it a data point.
It's a good PR attempt, to address what they must perceive as a significant problem, but...
Good luck convincing companies to trust your cloud infrastructure with their data, when they know for a fact that the US government (and probably other governments) could compel you to grant them secret access at any time, regardless of whatever client-access protections are in place. If MS could solve that massive security flaw, I'd be impressed; anything less is just polishing the proverbial turd.
Google's only really viable option, as far as I can tell, is to create a tailored censored portal for each country (really, legal jurisdiction, but basically the same thing), and allow anyone in that jurisdiction to request that anything be censored in an automated manner. Then they can create an "uncensored" jurisdiction, which you would need to opt into, with a disclaimer and such.
Once you have that, you can much more effectively fight these sort of "censor for the entire world" orders, by asserting that you already support per-jurisdiction "removal", and to remove globally would violate the rights of other jurisdictions to self-censor as appropriate. It's not perfect (nothing in international law is), but at least it would give Google a way to somewhat comply with the flood of censorship demands which are coming, without trying to fight each new demand independently.